International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Information / Recent Survey on International Arbitration and Mediation Is Mixed, but Does Not Have to Be

Recent Survey on International Arbitration and Mediation Is Mixed, but Does Not Have to Be

20/03/2013 by International Arbitration

A recent survey of corporate counsel for Fortune 1,000 companies, undertaken by Cornell and Pepperdine, paints a mixed picture of the health of international arbitration and mediation. Although the approach of general counsel at large companies to conflict management is anything but consistent, it is typically based  on the issue of how to control costs and risks. Although arbitration has played a significant role in business dispute resolution for the past half century, corporate counsel have become far less enthused by arbitration and mediation than they were in 1997, when Cornell initially conducted a survey of Fortune 1,000 corporate counsel.

At the time, corporate counsel expressed highly favorable views on the benefits of arbitration and mediation, especially concerning the saving of time and costs, results that were harder to overturn and more-specialized adjudicators. While this used to be true, in the most recent survey, general counsel’s view of the benefits of arbitration and mediation had markedly decreased. There seem to be many reasons for this, the most central of which is likely to be many law firms’ failure to adequately control the time and costs of both arbitrations and mediations on behalf of their clients, as well as their failure to provide adequate pre-dispute advice.

The growing phenomenon of arbitration boutiques is in direct response to arbitration’s and mediation’s recent failings in relation to time and costs, and arbitration boutiques based in Europe (such as our firm Lazareff Le Bars, recently chosen as the best arbitration firm by roughly 8,000 corporate counsel, see https://lepalmaresdesavocats.fr/resultats-palmares-des-avocats-2013.html) are being relied upon by legal departments throughout the world to ensure that the very best legal representation is procured swiftly and cost-effectively, restoring the former sheen to the many benefits of arbitration and mediation such as greater confidentiality, neutrality, speed, efficiency and the use of adjudicators and mediators with industry-specific expertise.

– William Kirtley, w.kirtley@lazareff-lebars.com

  

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Austria Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Iceland Arbitration, International Mediation

Search Arbitration Information

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

What Are the Recoverable Costs in ICC Arbitration?

Arbitration in the Caribbean

English Arbitration Act 2025: Key Reforms

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA