International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / ICSID Arbitration / The Admissibility of Evidence in International Arbitration

The Admissibility of Evidence in International Arbitration

04/11/2016 by International Arbitration

The admissibility of evidence in international arbitration has long been a debated issue. A piece of evidence must be admitted in order to be considered by the arbitral tribunal, which will then evaluate its probative value in light of the facts of the dispute.

Evidence is in principle admitted if it is relevant and material (although article 3.11 of the IBA Rules merely requires the party to “believe” in the relevance and materiality of the evidence), whereas its weight depends on its credibility (i.e., its reliability and authenticity to show what it is offered to prove).[1] In order to satisfy its burden of proof, a party has to offer sufficient evidence, taking into consideration the evidence as a whole, and to satisfy its burden of proving its allegations.

evidence in international arbitration

An issue that arose comes from the fact that broad discretion is given to the arbitral tribunal with respect to evidence in international arbitration. This could lead to abuse or ethically-tainted results in terms of the admissibility of evidence.

Such an issue has been seen recently in the context of an investment arbitration case. The ICSID tribunal in Caratube International Oil Company LLP and Devincci Salah Hourani v. Republic of Kazakhstan (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/13) may be said to have set out a principle that an arbitral tribunal can admit as evidence data or documents that were illegally obtained, for instance by hacking a computer network. In the case, the Kazakhstan government’s computer network was hacked and, consequently, the claimants obtained access to and relied on thousands of confidential documents that were published following the hacking.

Although nothing prevents a tribunal from admitting into evidence documents that may have been stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained, tribunals may refuse to admit such documents on the grounds of procedural fairness and the equality of parties.

  • Aurélie Ascoli, Aceris Law

[1] Konstantin Pilkov. Evidence in International Arbitration: Criteria for Admission and Evaluation. Arbitration. – 2014. – Vol. 80. – Issue 2 2014.

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Procedure, ICSID Arbitration, Kazakhstan Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Errors in the Employer’s Requirements under FIDIC Contracts: Legal Implications and Lessons Learned

Managing Construction Disputes: Understanding the Causes

China’s New Arbitration Law 2025: Overview of Key Changes

Unpaid Invoices and International Arbitration: Is It Worth It?

AI Construction Arbitrator: Revolutionising the Future of International Arbitration?

Effective Case Management in International Arbitration

Analysing the Site Visit Model Protocol for International Arbitration

Interpreting Treaties in Investment Arbitration

Blowing the Whistle on CAS: The CJEU’s RFC Seraing v. FIFA Decision

How Enforcement Works: Turning Arbitral Awards into Real-World Results

Notice of Arbitration by SMS: Efficiency vs. Fairness

Avoiding Pathological Arbitration Clauses: Do’s and Don’ts for In-House Counsel

© 2012-2025 · IA