International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / New York Convention / The New York Convention

The New York Convention

01/04/2016 by International Arbitration

The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (New York Convention) is a key instrument in the efficiency of international commercial arbitration. The New York Convention requires all contracting parties, over 160 states in 2016, to recognize and enforce international arbitration agreements on the one hand, and international arbitration awards on the other hand, subject to very limited caveats.

The fundamental requirement of presumptive validity of international arbitration agreements is contained at Article 2(1) of the New York Convention which provides that contracting states are required to recognize written agreements to arbitrate past or future disputes when the subject matter is capable of being settled by arbitration. Further, in accordance with Article 2(3), when the Parties have provided for such arbitration agreement, national courts must refer the Parties to arbitration and not hear the dispute.

Article 3 of the New York Convention provides for the presumptive finality of foreign arbitral awards by mandatorily requiring contracting states to recognize foreign arbitral awards as binding and enforce them, subject to the very limited exceptions contained at Article 5 of the New York Convention (e.g. excesses of jurisdiction, violations of fundamental procedural rights and public policy).

In practical terms, an award is “foreign” when it has been issued in a jurisdiction other than the jurisdiction where one Party seeks to have it enforced, and it will be enforced when both jurisdictions are contracting states to the New York Convention.

Therefore, the New York Convention does not affect the authority of a domestic court to annul or set aside an award made in the same jurisdiction, because it is not considered a foreign award, but a domestic award.

Download the PDF file .

Filed Under: New York Convention

Search Arbitration Information

The Urbajet Award on State Consent and Construction Losses

Three Fabricated Contracts, One Closed Door: Bahari v Azerbaijan

Defective Notice Prevents Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the United States

U.S. Court Rules That State-Owned Companies May Seek Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Against Foreign States

Annulment of the West African Aquaculture Award Against The Gambia

Can Arbitrators Cross-Examine Witnesses?

Tullow Ghana v. Ghana: Tax Arbitration and Contractual Protections

Rules of Ethics for Arbitrators: Which Apply?

LCIA Annual Casework Report 2025: Principal Statistics and Trends

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

© 2012-2026 · IA