International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Agreement / An ICC Space Arbitration: Eutelsat Communications v. SES

An ICC Space Arbitration: Eutelsat Communications v. SES

16/09/2013 by International Arbitration

An International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) of Paris arbitral tribunal has reached its conclusions on the first phase of the arbitration initiated by Eutelsat Communications against SES in October of 2012.  Similar space arbitrations are likely to account for an increasing number of arbitrations over the coming years.

Eutelsat’s request for arbitration was triggered by the claim by SES of the right to use 500 MHz of bandwidth in the 28.2/28.5° East orbital arc according to an agreement signed between SES and Media Broadcast in 2005 and only disclosed in October 2012. This request was founded on an alleged breach by SES of the Intersystem Coordination Agreement (ICA) signed with Eutelsat in 1999. The ICA signed by both operators covers use of certain orbital positions in Ku frequency bands over Europe and also favours competition in the satellite communications sector.

As a result of this first phase, the Arbitral Tribunal decided that:

— The ICA does not bar SES from using the disputed bands if and when Eutelsat does not hold the “regulatory” right to operate in these bands;

— SES did agree that Eutelsat would use the disputed bands as long as Eutelsat held the “regulatory” right to operate in these bands.

The Arbitral Tribunal did not decide on whether Eutelsat has the “regulatory” right. Eutelsat firmly believes and can demonstrate it has the “regulatory” right to operate in the disputed frequency bands.

On 30 August 2013, Media Broadcast obtained a preliminary injunction before the Regional Civil Court of Bonn preventing the use by Eutelsat of the disputed frequencies in the event that this creates harmful interference. Eutelsat will appeal this preliminary decision and confirms it does not intend to create harmful interference.

The purpose of the second phase of the arbitration with the ICC is to decide, amongst other issues, whether SES was entitled to sign an agreement in 2005 with Media Broadcast without breaching its obligations under the ICA.

You may find Eutelsat’s Press Release here: https://marketwatch.com/story/eutelsat-statement-on-operations-at-285-east-2013-09-16

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Information, Austria Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, France Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, Iceland Arbitration, Italy Arbitration, Paris Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

What Are the Recoverable Costs in ICC Arbitration?

Arbitration in the Caribbean

English Arbitration Act 2025: Key Reforms

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA