International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Energy Charter Treaty / Spain Energy Treaty Arbitrations Continue

Spain Energy Treaty Arbitrations Continue

06/11/2016 by International Arbitration

On 12 August 2016, another Spain energy treaty arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty was registered at the ICSID.

The claimants are two Dutch companies, Cordoba Beheer B.V. and Sevilla Beheer B.V., together with Cross Retail S.L and Spanish Project companies, both registered in Spain.[1] This case is just another in line with dozens of arbitrations started by foreign investors against Spain following renewable energy sector reforms and the modification of feed-in tariffs.

Spain energy treaty arbitrations

Another significant development with respect to energy cases against Spain is the constitution of the arbitral tribunal in a case brought by SunFlower Olmeda GmbH & Co and Others. O. Thomas Johnson was nominated by the Claimant, Professor Piero Bernardini nominated by the Respondent, and the Presiding Arbitrator was jointly nominated by the parties to be Sir Christopher Greenwood.[2]

So far, only two awards against Spain have been issued and dozens remain pending. Both awards have been issued by SCC Tribunals and both were in favour of Spain.

The first award, Charanne & Construction v Spain was issued in January this year where the tribunal dismissed all of the claimant’s allegations in relation to the feed-in tariffs modifications by the Spanish Government.[3] The second award followed in July, in a case brought by the Dutch investor – Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands B.V. However, it still remains confidential since neither of the parties released the award.

So far, Spain has managed to defend itself successfully and to avoid any liability for the measures and reforms in the energy sector passed by the government between 2008 and 2013.

It remains to be seen whether dozen of other arbitral tribunals, which are not bound by precedent, will share the same view.

  • Nina Jankovic, Aceris Law

[1] https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/cases/pages/casedetail.aspx?CaseNo=ARB/16/27

[2] https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/cases/pages/casedetail.aspx?CaseNo=ARB/16/17

[3] https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7162.pdf

 

Filed Under: Energy Charter Treaty, SCC Arbitration, Spain Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Errors in the Employer’s Requirements under FIDIC Contracts: Legal Implications and Lessons Learned

Managing Construction Disputes: Understanding the Causes

China’s New Arbitration Law 2025: Overview of Key Changes

Unpaid Invoices and International Arbitration: Is It Worth It?

AI Construction Arbitrator: Revolutionising the Future of International Arbitration?

Effective Case Management in International Arbitration

Analysing the Site Visit Model Protocol for International Arbitration

Interpreting Treaties in Investment Arbitration

Blowing the Whistle on CAS: The CJEU’s RFC Seraing v. FIFA Decision

How Enforcement Works: Turning Arbitral Awards into Real-World Results

Notice of Arbitration by SMS: Efficiency vs. Fairness

Avoiding Pathological Arbitration Clauses: Do’s and Don’ts for In-House Counsel

© 2012-2025 · IA