International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Information / Kosovo Telecom Arbitration

Kosovo Telecom Arbitration

09/02/2017 by International Arbitration

Kosovo Telecom ArbitrationThe largest commercial arbitration in the youngest European State – the Kosovo Telecom arbitration – has come to an end. In a dispute between local mobile operator Dardafone, operating in Kosovo under the trading name Z Mobile, and Telekom Kosovo, at the time known as PTK, an ICC Tribunal seated in London has ordered Dardafone to be paid over €30 million in damages along with access to infrastructure and 3G and 4G networks. The Tribunal was chaired by Georg von Segesser from Germany, alongside two other members, Franz Schwarz, an Austrian national, and Jernerej Sekolec, of Slovenian nationality.

Kosovo Telecom ArbitrationThe dispute originates from the unclear terms of an agreement and questions as to whether Z Mobile had access to infrastructure and new technologies. Telekom Kosovo argued that the terms of the agreement were such that it had no obligation whatsoever to provide any new technologies to Z Mobile, with the opposing party claiming the opposite. The Arbitral Tribunal’s conclusion was that Telekom Kosovo was under an obligation to provide both new technologies and access to infrastructure, and it awarded Z Mobile over €30 million in lost profits, contractual penalties and arbitration costs. In addition, Z Mobile was also awarded specific performance under the agreement and gained full access to PTK’s infrastructure resources to 3G and 4G networks.

This is not the first international arbitration involving Kosovo and its telecommunication sector. We have already reported on Kosovo’s first case at the ICSID here https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/kosovo-icsid-arbitration/. That investment dispute, interestingly enough, was brought by a German telecom investor, Axos Capital, against the Government of Kosovo over the failed privatization deal with respect to Kosovo’s telecommunications company PTK. The arbitral tribunal was constituted in December 2015 and the case remains pending.

It is interesting to note that there have been more issues involving the Kosovo telecommunications sector with respect to mobile operators and the country code. These have been the subject of extensive political negotiations held between Kosovo and Serbia under the auspices of the EU. A final compromise was reached in November last year, with Kosovo gaining its own country code (+383) and Serbian Telekom, the largest mobile operator in Serbia, being allowed to operate freely in the territory of Kosovo.

It remains to be seen whether there will be additional Kosovo Telecom arbitrations in the future.

  • Nina Jankovic, Aceris Law SARL

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Rules, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Kosovo Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

What Are the Recoverable Costs in ICC Arbitration?

Arbitration in the Caribbean

English Arbitration Act 2025: Key Reforms

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA