International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Russia Arbitration / New Arbitration against Russia Arising out of the Annexation of Crimea

New Arbitration against Russia Arising out of the Annexation of Crimea

11/10/2016 by International Arbitration

As we anticipated in January 2015, arbitrations have arisen against Russia due to its annexation of Crimea.Arbitration against Russia for Crimea

After months of threats and announcements by the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a new investment treaty case against Russia in relation to annexation of Crimea is about start. The first case, Ukrnafta v. Russia, PJSC Ukrnafta v. Russia was filed in 2015 at the PCA and concerns the alleged illegal expropriation of petrol stations in Crimea following 2014 annexation.

The new case is a maritime claim filled under Annex VII of the UNCLOS Convention and relates to potentially oil-rich waters in the Black Sea, the Adjacent Sea of Azov, and the narrow Kerch Strait that links the two seas. This part has been controversially annexed by Russia in March 2014, and Ukraine is now bringing claims stating that Russia’s illegal acts have “usurped and interfered” with Ukraine’s maritime rights. In the statement announcing the new claim, Ukraine’s ministry emphasized that when joining UNCLOS both Ukraine and Russia agreed to settle disputes though binding arbitration and not though ICJ or ITLOS. However, Ukraine will face jurisdictional issues since it needs to find a way to avoid Russia’s Article 298 declaration which excludes jurisdiction relating to sea boundary delimitations.

The Statement of Claim is still not available online. Ukrainian ministry claims that Russia, amongst other, seized oil and gas mineral fields in the seas, prevented Ukrainian vessels from fishing, and seized both fish catch and the power to regulate fish catch, constructed a gas pipeline, and explored archaeological and historical sites in the Black Sea bed, all without Ukrainian consent. A battle on jurisdictional issues will most certainly follow, in case Russia decides to respond to this arbitration at all or decides to boycott the entire process. The Arbitration will most likely be hosted by the PCA. It will be interesting to see how the Tribunal approaches these legally complex and politically-sensitive issues.

  • Nina Jankovic, Aceris Law SARL

Filed Under: International Arbitration Law, Law Of The Sea, PCA Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, Ukraine Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

What Are the Recoverable Costs in ICC Arbitration?

Arbitration in the Caribbean

English Arbitration Act 2025: Key Reforms

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA