International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Information / The Role of the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant in the Yukos Awards

The Role of the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant in the Yukos Awards

06/06/2016 by International Arbitration

When The Hague District Court annulled the Yukos awards on 20 April 2016 for a lack of a valid arbitration agreement, it did not consider it necessary to rule on the other grounds raised by the Russian Federation, in particular the argument that the Tribunal failed to personally fulfill its duty because of the alleged significant influence of the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant over the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision.arbitral tribunal assistant

While the Chairman had initially declared that the duty of the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant would be to “assist [the Chairman] in the conduct of the case”, provide administrative assistance and exercise liaison duties, the Russian Federation’s argument was that substantive responsibilities were delegated to the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant in breach of the Tribunal’s obligation to perform its duties personally.

The Russian Federation supported its claim by arguing that the 3,000 hours that the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant spent on the case cannot be justified by his administrative and logistical role, in particular as two staff members of the PCA had already spent over 5,000 hours on the proceedings. Further, the Russian Federation argued that the Tribunal’s refusal to elaborate on the role of the assistant to protect the confidentiality of the Tribunal’s deliberations is an admission that the assistant participated in the deliberations.

Given the complexity of arbitration cases, the abundance of communications, and the lack of logistical support inherent to the practice of arbitration, the use of assistants and secretaries by arbitral tribunals is a widespread practice within the community of international arbitrators in both international commercial and investor-state arbitrations. Many institutional rules have explicitly provided for the use of administrative secretaries and assistants.

One the one hand, there is a broad international consensus that the duties of the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant only include administrative and logistical tasks as an arbitrator’s mission is intuitu personae and, as such, may not be delegated. Unlike judges, arbitrators may select their cases and are able to refuse an appointment if they lack the time and resources to complete their mission adequately.

On the other hand, one may denounce the hypocrisy of a party’s acceptance, as the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant, of a senior associate (now senior partner) of an international law firm specialized in international arbitration proceedings, only to raise in the setting aside proceedings the strong possibility of his involvement in substantive matters related to the case. May this party allege, in bona fide, that it did not expect the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant to inform the Tribunal as to the substance of the case or to help digest the arguments or evidence submitted?

The Hague District Court failed to rule on the Russian Federation’s argument on the role of the Arbitral Tribunal Assistant. Other courts, which are not obliged to follow its ruling in accordance with Article V of the New York Convention of 1958, may choose to discuss this issue in further setting aside proceedings. Different legal cultures will almost certainly have different opinions on the proper role of Arbitral Tribunal Assistants, but a ruling on this issue would appear to be timely.

  • Olivier Marquais, Aceris Law

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitrator, Energy Charter Treaty, New York Convention, PCA Arbitration, Russia Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Global Supply Chains, Tariffs and the Role of International Arbitration

Criminal Liability of Arbitrators

Data Protection in International Arbitration

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA