Violations of the National Treatment standard are often alleged by claimants involved in investment arbitrations. The National Treatment standard has a simple theoretical purpose: to ensure that foreign investors or their investments will be treated no less favourably than domestic investors or their investments. The application of the National Treatment standard can vary significantly depending […]
Correction of Arbitration Awards
Correction of arbitration awards is one of the post-award remedies intended to rectify any errors, ambiguities or omissions in the arbitral tribunal’s award after its issuance. It frequently occurs in practice that arbitral awards contain certain minor, or sometimes, more significant, mistakes, ambiguities or omissions. While these errors usually concern minor and incidental issues, certain […]
Correction of Arbitral Awards in ICC Arbitration
To err is human, so the ICC Arbitration Rules provide for a special mechanism aiming to correct errors in arbitral awards. The correction of arbitral awards in ICC Arbitration is governed by Article 36 of the 2017 ICC Arbitration Rules, which reads: “Article 36: Correction and Interpretation of the Award; Remission of Awards 1) On its own […]
ICSID Caseload Statistics
Recently, the International Centre of Settlement of International Dispute (“ICSID”) announced a new case record.[1] According to its caseload statistics published on 2 February 2018, the institution registered a record of 53 claims over 2017. Out of these cases, 49 were submitted under the ICSID Convention, while 4 were conducted under the ICSID Additional Facility rules. The […]
Arbitration Award Enforced in England Despite Evidence of Fraud
The New York Convention compels its 157 contracting Parties to enforce arbitration awards: “A New York Convention award may, by leave of the court, be enforced in the same manner as a judgment or order of the court to the same effect”. This enforcement requirement, found in Section 101 of the Arbitration Act 1996, is however […]