Artificial intelligence (“AI”) is increasingly being used in international arbitration for legal research, document review, translation, and drafting. However, its use becomes difficult to assess when an arbitrator turns to AI not merely to process information, but to obtain a view on a legal issue that the tribunal must decide. There is presently no generally […]
Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the “AI Act”), approved by the Council of the European Union on 21 May 2024[1] and entered into force on 1 August 2024,[2] is a regulation on artificial intelligence (“AI”) that establishes extensive legal requirements in relation to AI systems classified as “high-risk”.[3] In support of the AI Act, the European Commission […]
Deepfakes in International Arbitration
Deepfakes may soon become a practical problem for international arbitration. Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into arbitral procedure and decision-making, as discussed in a previous Aceris Law note on LaPaglia v. Valve. AI tools are frequently praised for their capacity to produce large volumes of text, images, audio and video within seconds. Yet […]
When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication
As artificial intelligence (“AI”) tools become increasingly integrated into legal practice, their use by arbitrators is no longer a theoretical possibility but a practical reality. From drafting procedural orders to organising evidence or even assisting in the preparation of awards, AI offers the promise of greater efficiency, consistency, and cost-effectiveness. But what happens when that […]