International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Bilateral Investment Treaty

Fork in the Road Provision in Investment Arbitration

16/02/2019 by International Arbitration

Fork in the Road Provision in Investment Arbitration

The fork in the road provision, or Electa una via, non datur recursus ad alteram (English translation: “when one way has been chosen, no recourse is given to another”[1]), belongs to a category of jurisdiction-declining provisions[2] marking “the relationship between international arbitration and adjudication by domestic courts.”[3] However, it should be noted that certain tribunals have […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Rules, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Final Version of the Netherlands Model BIT Released

01/01/2019 by International Arbitration

Final Netherlands BIT

Previously, we analysed the main features of the 2018 Draft Netherlands Model BIT and concluded that the instrument could mark a new era in investment arbitration in the Netherlands. The Draft was open to consultation until 18 June 2017. The finalized text was adopted and released on 19 October 2018. The final version of the […]

Filed Under: Bilateral Investment Treaty, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Netherlands Arbitration

Legitimate Expectations in Investment Arbitration

14/10/2018 by International Arbitration

In its judgment rendered on 1 October 2018 in the Bolivia v. Chile case, the International Court of Justice drew a distinction between public international law and investment arbitration with respect to the notion of legitimate expectations. The Court held that, contrary to bilateral investment treaties where the principle of legitimate expectations of foreign investors […]

Filed Under: Bilateral Investment Treaty, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Public International Law

The National Treatment Standard – Investment Arbitration

04/10/2018 by International Arbitration

Investment Arbitration

Violations of the National Treatment standard are often alleged by claimants involved in investment arbitrations. The National Treatment standard has a simple theoretical purpose: to ensure that foreign investors or their investments will be treated no less favourably than domestic investors or their investments. The application of the National Treatment standard can vary significantly depending […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Investor State Dispute Settlement

The Standard of Full Protection and Security for Foreign Investors

02/10/2018 by International Arbitration

Security for Foreign Investors

The standard of full protection and security is one of the basic principles of investment protection applicable to investor-State arbitrations. Its content, scope of application and the sanctioned behaviors of host States of investment can be diverse. Doctrinal Definition of the Standard of Full Protection and Security According to doctrine, the standard of full protection […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Rules, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Investor State Dispute Settlement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 8
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Understanding Risk Allocation in FIDIC Construction Contracts

Provisional Measures in CAS Arbitration: IGF v. FIG

Errors in the Employer’s Requirements under FIDIC Contracts: Legal Implications and Lessons Learned

Managing Construction Disputes: Understanding the Causes

China’s New Arbitration Law 2025: Overview of Key Changes

Unpaid Invoices and International Arbitration: Is It Worth It?

AI Construction Arbitrator: Revolutionising the Future of International Arbitration?

Effective Case Management in International Arbitration

Analysing the Site Visit Model Protocol for International Arbitration

Interpreting Treaties in Investment Arbitration

Blowing the Whistle on CAS: The CJEU’s RFC Seraing v. FIFA Decision

How Enforcement Works: Turning Arbitral Awards into Real-World Results

© 2012-2025 · IA