International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Cape Verde Arbitration / Cape Verde Arbitration – 158th Contracting State to the New York Convention

Cape Verde Arbitration – 158th Contracting State to the New York Convention

08/10/2018 by International Arbitration

Cape Verde, through Resolution 26 / IX / 2017 of 7 February, approved its accession to the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “New York Convention“), becoming the 158th contracting State to the New York Convention.

Cape Verde ArbitrationFollowing its ratification, on 22 March 2018, the Secretary-General of the United Nations confirmed that Cape Verde deposited the Letter of Accession to the New York Convention, completing the process of accession. Consequently, Cape Verde became the 158th Contracting State to the New York Convention, which entered into force in the country on 20 June 2018 (90 days after the deposit of the instrument of accession, in accordance with Article XII (2) of the New York Convention).

According to Art. 2 of Resolution 26 / IX / 2017, Cape Verde has made a common reservation based on the Principle of Reciprocity, establishing that it will only apply the Convention in which the arbitral awards have been made in the territory of another signatory State.

The Cape Verdean Arbitration Law (Law 76/VI/2005 of 16 August) is primarily inspired by the old Portuguese Arbitration Law (Law 31/1986 of 29 August), but is similar to the UNCITRAL Model Law.

Although the internal law of Cape Verde (Articles 44 and 45) already provided for the automatic recognition of foreign arbitral awards, adherence to the New York Convention imposes international standards to Cape Verde in this regard, while establishing a more common legal procedure.

Having contributed significantly to the simplification and harmonization of procedures for the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards, the New York Convention has two important features:

(i) it imposes the recognition of arbitration agreements by the signatory State, provided that they respect a matter that can be resolved by means of arbitration and therefore, imposing a duty on the courts of the signatory State to refuse to judge any disputes which are covered by an arbitration agreement that is valid and effective; and

(ii) it imposes on the signatory State the recognition and enforceability of arbitral awards rendered in another signatory State, in accordance with the rules of procedure of the territory in which the judgement is invoked and in accordance with the conditions laid down in the New York Convention itself.

By joining the New York Convention, Cape Verde arbitration is becoming more credible to resolve international disputes.

Ana Constantino, Aceris Law LLC

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Cape Verde Arbitration, New York Convention

Search Arbitration Information

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

© 2012-2026 · IA