International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Philippines Arbitration / Aceris Successfully Resolves International Arbitration under California Law

Aceris Successfully Resolves International Arbitration under California Law

19/09/2017 by International Arbitration

Aceris Law has assisted a Filipino respondent in obtaining the successful resolution of a JAMS international arbitration under California law brought against it.

The JAMS arbitration, initiated by a U.S. public company specialising in computer network infrastructure, was brought against the Filipino company in relation to alleged breaches of a contract. 

The arbitration involved parallel criminal proceedings taking place in the Republic of the Philippines. Aceris Settlement JAMS International Arbitration California Law

Following the Parties’ submissions on the merits, Aceris assisted its client in settling all related disputes, on favourable terms for its client.    

William Kirtley, Nina Jankovic and Andrian Beregoi primarily served as legal advisers. 

“We are always pleased when Aceris can help our client reach its objectives in a cost-effective manner,” said William Kirtley, the principal of Aceris Law. “We will always suggest what is in our client’s interests, be it seeing an arbitration through until a final award, or amicable settlement. Like litigation, arbitration can waste considerable sums of money, time and talent. When settlement is envisageable on fair terms for our client, as was the case here, we will not hesitate to explore this option.”

Filed Under: Aceris Law, International Arbitration Boutiques, International Arbitration Law, International Mediation, Philippines Arbitration, United States Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

© 2012-2026 · IA