International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / United States Arbitration / Aceris Successfully Resolves ICDR Arbitration for Canadian Respondent

Aceris Successfully Resolves ICDR Arbitration for Canadian Respondent

13/01/2018 by International Arbitration

Aceris Law has assisted another Canadian client in obtaining the successful resolution of an ICDR arbitration brought against it.

The ICDR arbitration, initiated by a Fortune 500 American electronic commerce company against the Canadian respondent, concerned alleged illegal acts under U.S. federal law, alleged violations of Washington State law and claims of breach of contract.

Aceris Law ICDR Arbitration Canada Settlement

Following the Parties’ submissions on jurisdiction and the merits, Aceris assisted its client in proposing settlement and settling the matter on favourable terms.    

William Kirtley, Nina Jankovic and Andrian Beregoi primarily served as legal advisers. 

“We are always glad when Aceris helps a client to reach its objectives in a cost-effective manner,” said William Kirtley, the principal of Aceris Law. “All arbitrations can harm relationships, reputations and eat up enormous sums of money, time and talent. If we are convinced that settlement is in our client’s interests, and it can be achieved on fair terms for our client, then we always seek what is in our client’s interest.”   

Filed Under: Aceris Law, Canada Arbitration, Intellectual Property Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Philippines Arbitration, United States Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

Investment Arbitration: The Case Against a Standing Investment Court

Saudi Arbitration: What the 2026 SCCA Country Report Shows

© 2012-2026 · IA