International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Agreement / GAR Article On Barotseland Request For PCA Arbitration

GAR Article On Barotseland Request For PCA Arbitration

13/04/2014 by International Arbitration

Sylvana Sinha, William Kirtley and Christophe Dugué have been featured in the latest issue of the Global Arbitration Review with respect to their client’s request to have the current legal status of Barotseland, a former British protectorate that chose to become part of Zambia in return for an agreement for autonomy that was never respected, determined via PCA arbitration.  The article may be found available online at:

https://globalarbitrationreview.com/news/article/32568/barotseland-asks-zambia-go-pca/

They are representing the Barotseland National Freedom Alliance, an umbrella organization of all activists’ groups (Linyungandambo, Barotse Freedom Movement, Movement for the Restoration of Barotseland, Barotse Patriotic Front, Barotse Youth league and others) formed for the purpose of coordinating the implementation of the sovereign resolutions of March 2012 Barotse National Council in a peaceful manner.

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Austria Arbitration, Barotseland Arbitration, PCA Arbitration, Zambia Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Defective Notice Prevents Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the United States

U.S. Court Rules That State-Owned Companies May Seek Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Against Foreign States

Annulment of the West African Aquaculture Award Against The Gambia

Can Arbitrators Cross-Examine Witnesses?

Tullow Ghana v. Ghana: Tax Arbitration and Contractual Protections

Rules of Ethics for Arbitrators: Which Apply?

LCIA Annual Casework Report 2025: Principal Statistics and Trends

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

© 2012-2026 · IA