International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / International Arbitration Boutiques / Aceris Law Again Ranked in Legal 500 for International Arbitration

Aceris Law Again Ranked in Legal 500 for International Arbitration

18/04/2020 by International Arbitration

Aceris Law has again been ranked in the Legal 500 in the field of international arbitration, along with a number of other well-known international firms.

Legal 500 Arbitration

 

“It is always a pleasure to see our hard work recognized,” said William Kirtley of Aceris Law. “We have won or settled over a dozen disputes over the past two years alone, bringing significant value to our clients. We currently are counsel in a number of quite large disputes, although we also serve as counsel for clients in the Middle East, the United States, Europe, Africa and Asia in smaller commercial, construction and investment arbitrations. Although I was told when working at a large international firm that clients assume that lawyers are good only if they charge exorbitant legal fees, I think that clients are becoming more sophisticated about the way that they select legal counsel, as more information is available today than was the case two decades ago. The main differences between Aceris Law and our similarly-ranked competitors are: (1) we always try to give excellent value to our clients and to charge reasonable legal fees, never attempting to maximize our own profit, (2) we are generally more comfortable with the use of modern technology than our peers and more accessible, (3) we serve clients in all markets and actually go to our clients (when the borders are not closed) maintaining permanent access to offices throughout the world and (4) we only hire the best and brightest lawyers who actually care about whether our clients win or lose their cases. We have not lost a single case with the current team that is in place, which took time to build but now has significant rigor and depth.”         

Aceris Law Legal 500

 

Filed Under: Aceris Law, International Arbitration Boutiques, International Arbitration Law

Search Arbitration Information

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

© 2012-2026 · IA