International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Serbia Arbitration / METAL VM J.S. V. JANINA (ARB/01/11) – AWARD

METAL VM J.S. V. JANINA (ARB/01/11) – AWARD

05/06/2017 by International Arbitration

The arbitration award in Metal VM J.S. v. Janina was the first award to be rendered by the Arbitration Court of the Kosovo Chamber of Commerce.

This arbitration concerned a dispute arising out of a sales contract signed in 2009 between Metal VM (a Serbian corporation) and Janina (a Kosovo corporation) regarding electric boilers to be used for a central heating system.

METAL VM J.S. V. JANINA

The agreed price for each boiler was € 260,00. Claimant (seller) started delivering the boilers in May and, in August, sent the notice for payment. Respondent replied that the parties orally agreed that payment would be made either at the bank account or by delivering substitute goods to claimant.

In 2011, Claimant filed for arbitration before the Permanent Tribunal of Arbitration at the Kosovo Chamber of Commerce for compensation in the amount of € 26.000,00.

First, the Sole Arbitrator upheld its jurisdiction over the claim according to the Kosovo Arbitration Rules of 2011, since it was clear that the dispute arose out of a sales contract between the parties to the arbitration.

On the merits, the Sole Arbitrator held that Kosovo Law describes a sales contract as a special contract and, as such, it can only be modified in writing and signed by both parties. Therefore, any modification made orally shall be considered invalid unless made with prior written consent of the parties. The Tribunal thus ruled that the oral amendment could not be taken into consideration.

Further, the Sole Arbitrator found that Respondent failed to fulfill its contractual obligations and so breached the sales contract.

As a result, the Sole Arbitrator allowed payment of penalties at the request of the Claimant. The Sole Arbitrator stated that penalties were to be calculated from July 21, 2011, which is the date when the Claimant requested the commencement of arbitral proceedings and submitted its request before the Permanent Tribunal of Arbitration.

The Tribunal thus ordered Respondent to pay Claimant the amount of € 26.000,00, as well as € 1.900,00 for procedural costs.

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Cost, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, International Arbitration Law, Kosovo Arbitration, Serbia Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

What Are the Recoverable Costs in ICC Arbitration?

Arbitration in the Caribbean

English Arbitration Act 2025: Key Reforms

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA