International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Information / Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the New York Convention

Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the New York Convention

07/05/2013 by International Arbitration

I am pleased to inform you that the Myanmar, which has been gradually re-entering the international community, has deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. With an accession made without any reservation, Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the Convention, which spans all major industrialized countries in the world. 

The 1958 New York Convention will enter into force with respect to Myanmar on July 15, 2013, after which arbitration may be used far more freely, guaranteeing additional security for transactions concerning Myanmar. The UNCITRAL website provides the list of countries bound by the 1958 New York Convention through ratification, accession or succession:

https://uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention_status.html

For additional information on international arbitration in Myanmar under the current arbitration regime, please click here:

William Kirtley’s IAA Tools – Arbitration in Myanmar (Old Regime)

Kind regards,
– William Kirtley

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Rules, Armenia Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Myanmar Arbitration, New York Convention, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

Krimpets, Commerce, and Arbitration: The Supreme Court’s Latest FAA § 1 Decision

Rwanda v. UK: PCA Tribunal Rejects Claims Over the Asylum Partnership Agreement

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

Can Misconduct in Arbitration Invalidate an Award?

Indus Waters Treaty Arbitration: Can India Put the Treaty in Abeyance?

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

UNCITRAL SPEDR Adjudication and the Construction Industry

Environmental Liability in International Arbitration: Niko Resources and the Limits of Recoverable Loss

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

© 2012-2026 · IA