International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Information / Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the New York Convention

Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the New York Convention

07/05/2013 by International Arbitration

I am pleased to inform you that the Myanmar, which has been gradually re-entering the international community, has deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. With an accession made without any reservation, Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the Convention, which spans all major industrialized countries in the world. 

The 1958 New York Convention will enter into force with respect to Myanmar on July 15, 2013, after which arbitration may be used far more freely, guaranteeing additional security for transactions concerning Myanmar. The UNCITRAL website provides the list of countries bound by the 1958 New York Convention through ratification, accession or succession:

https://uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention_status.html

For additional information on international arbitration in Myanmar under the current arbitration regime, please click here:

William Kirtley’s IAA Tools – Arbitration in Myanmar (Old Regime)

Kind regards,
– William Kirtley

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Rules, Armenia Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Myanmar Arbitration, New York Convention, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

© 2012-2026 · IA