International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Information / The Relationship between International Investment Arbitration and Sovereign Debt Restructuring

The Relationship between International Investment Arbitration and Sovereign Debt Restructuring

01/06/2014 by International Arbitration

Abstract:      

The two cases of Abaclat and others v. Argentina Republic and Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. and others v. Argentine Republic have attracted much attention in the application of international investment arbitrationin sovereign debt restructuring. However, the relationship between the international investment law and the sovereign debt restructuring is complex and controversial, since the widespread investment arbitration may hinder the process of sovereign debt restructuring. It may even eradicate its role in the sovereign debt issues under the international investment law framework.To avoid such problems, international investment arbitration under BITs should be applied to sovereign debt restructuring in a more restrictive manner.
The Relationship between the International Investment Arbitration and Sovereign Debt Restructuring
Source: Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 229-250, May 2014, by Kai-wei Chan, National Taiwan University, College of Law.

 

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Argentina Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Iceland Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Italy Arbitration, Norway Arbitration, Taiwan Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Rules of Ethics for Arbitrators: Which Apply?

LCIA Annual Casework Report 2025: Principal Statistics and Trends

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

© 2012-2026 · IA