The Claimant in this case was a subsidiary of Société d’Aménagement Urbain et Rural, S.A., specializing in water production, water treatment, water distribution and sanitization. The Claimant had participated and won a bid by the Province of Mendoza to privatize the Argentinian company Obras Sanitarias Mendoza (“OSM”). OSM and the Province then signed a concession […]
GETMA INTERNATIONAL, NCT NECOTRANS, GETMA INTERNATIONAL INVESTISSEMENTS & NCT INFRASTRUCTURE & LOGISTIQUE v. THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA – ICSID 28 June 2012
This decision relates to the Respondent’s request to disqualify one of the arbitrators, namely Mr. Bernardo M. Cremades, who had been appointed by the Claimant. The Claimant had filed for arbitration at the ICSID on 29 September 2011 under the ICSID Convention and the Investment Code of the Republic of Guinea. The Parties agreed that […]
IMPREGILO S.P.A. V. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/07/17) – AWARD of 21 June 2011
In 1996, Claimant was awarded a contract for a concession to privatize the water and sewer services of the Province of Buenos Aires. To execute the contract, Claimant incorporated AGBA (an Argentinean company). Under the contract, AGBA acquired the exclusive right to collect, treat, transport, distribute and commercialize water and sewage and, in return, was […]
MALICORP LIMITED V. THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/08/18) – AWARD
The dispute between Malicorp Ltd, an English Company, and the Republic of Egypt, arose out of the allegedly illegal termination of a concession contract amounting to a violation of the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Egypt of 1975 (the “BIT”). In 2000, Malicorp was awarded a […]
ATA CONSTRUCTION, INDUSTRIAL AND TRADING COMPANY V. THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN (ICSID CASE ARB/08/2) AWARD 18 May 2010
In this ICSID case Claimant, a Turkish company, started an arbitration in relation to a dispute with the Arab Potash Company (“APC”), a Jordan government-owned company, arising out of the collapse of a dike Claimant had built. On 30 September 2003, a FIDIC Tribunal issued an award entirely in favor of Claimant. Following this ruling, […]