International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Israel Arbitration / Palestine Threatens Sports Arbitration

Palestine Threatens Sports Arbitration

21/11/2016 by International Arbitration

The Palestinian Football Association (“PFA”) has threatened to go to the Court for Sports Arbitration (“CAS”) unless FIFA agrees to take action against Israel over clubs based in the “illegally occupied” territory of the West Bank. Our previous reporting on CAS, its role and jurisdiction can be found here.

The dispute concerns six Israeli football clubs playing in Israel’s lower division which are based on the West Bank. According to FIFA rules, clubs affiliated with one member association cannot play on the territory of another member association without the latter’s or FIFA’s consent. Palestine claims that this territory is occupied under international law and that the clubs are playing there without the permission of the PFA, recognized by FIFA since 1998.

To solve this issue, FIFA established a special monitoring committee for Israel-Palestine to consider the complaints against Israeli FA. Last week, the committee met for seven hours in Zurich to discuss the issue but failed to reach any decision, prompting PFA President Jibril Rajoub to suggest that the matter may need to be resolved by the CAS. Speaking after Tuesday’s meeting, PFA President Rajoub said Israeli officials had not come up with any serious argument. “I don’t think there will be any agreement, if they are not going forward, we can go to the CAS” he said.

The next meeting to solve the matter is expected at the meeting of FIFA’s council in January. This is not the first time CAS may have to deal with highly sensitive and political issues.

This raises another question: is CAS an appropriate forum and is international arbitration the method for resolving disputes regarding geopolitical issues? It is certainly not intended to resolve such disputes. However, it is not the first time the CAS has been faced with sensitive political issues. We already reported on Serbia’s challenge of the Kosovo admission to UEFA here. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has also arisen in a sports context when Scottish Club Glasgow Celtic was fined by UEFA for displaying Palestinian flags. A Serbia-Albania football match during the qualification for the World Cup eventually had to be decided by the CAS. The way things are heading, it does not look too promising for the future of sports arbitration as a “neutral forum” for the settlement of sport disputes.

  • – Nina Jankovic, Aceris Law SARL

Filed Under: Israel Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Armed Conflict and Investment Arbitration

Third-Party Funding for International Arbitration

How to Commence an ICC Arbitration

Arbitration and the Democratic Republic of the Congo

How to Remove an Arbitrator from an Ongoing Arbitration

Aceris Law Defeats Claims in Another ICC Arbitration under English Law

International Arbitration in Italy: 2022 Amendments

Appealing International Arbitration Awards

Translate


Recommended Links

  • Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2023 · IA