International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Award / Saudi Arabia Gets First Commercial Arbitration Center

Saudi Arabia Gets First Commercial Arbitration Center

30/04/2014 by International Arbitration

On 14 April 2014, the Council of Ministers approved the formation of the Saudi Centre for Commercial Arbitration, which will be based in the capital city, Riyadh.

It will operate under the auspices of the Council of Saudi Chambers, a federation of chambers of commerce, and will handle international commercial arbitrations.

The minister of culture and information has said that the centre will have a board of directors who will serve three-year terms.  The centre will, interestingly, also have branches outside of Saudi Arabia.

The public sector continues to be the driving force behind the Saudi economy, yet government procurement laws mandate that disputes must be referred to local courts, even in relation to contracts involving complex projects or large values. International experience suggests that arbitration leads to better outcomes than local court litigation for all concerned, and the new centre will hopefully promote greater awareness and trust in the arbitration process in Saudi Arabia.

At the very least, the new Saudi centre will likely provide state-of-the-art facilities in which arbitrations can physically be held.

This development is one in a series of demonstrations by the Saudi government of its commitment to offering Saudi Arabia as an inviting venue for parties choosing international commercial arbitration as their dispute resolution mechanism.

The decision to form an arbitration centre comes two years after Saudi Arabia approved a new arbitration law. Based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, the law provides for party autonomy and limited oversight by the courts by excluding judicial review of awards on the merits, which had been common in Saudi Arabia.

Such a decision is good news for clients with disputes in Saudi Arabia.  Under the new Saudi Arabian arbitration law, decisions can be annulled if they are not compliant with Sharia law, and this development should decrease the risk of this happening.

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Austria Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Saudi Arabia Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

UNCITRAL SPEDR Adjudication and the Construction Industry

Environmental Liability in International Arbitration: Niko Resources and the Limits of Recoverable Loss

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

Investment Arbitration in Mexico: Why an Over USD 2.1 Billion Claim Failed

New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Arbitration in Próspera: An Arbitration Utopia?

Timing of Jurisdictional Objections in Arbitration

Law 2540/2025: A Significant Expansion of Arbitral Power

Construction Arbitration: War, Delay Claims, and Rising Project Costs

State Immunity and ICSID Awards: The UK Supreme Court Joins International Consensus on Enforcement

Singapore’s High Court Rejects Spain’s State Immunity Defence (NextEra Energy v Spain [2026] SGHC 43)

Devas v. Antrix: Dutch Enforcement and the Limits of Seat-Based Annulment

© 2012-2026 · IA