International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / ICC Arbitration / Aceris Law Wins Another ICC Arbitration under Swiss Law

Aceris Law Wins Another ICC Arbitration under Swiss Law

30/01/2020 by International Arbitration

Aceris Law is pleased to have won another ICC arbitration under Swiss law for a European client regarding the construction of a cement plant in a West African State. Representing the Employer, the dispute concerned back charges, liquidated damages for delay and damages caused by the breach of the arbitration agreement. As usual, Aceris Law’s client was awarded the majority of its costs for the arbitration in the Final Award, with the Tribunal specifying that “[Aceris Law] conducted themselves in an expeditious, cost-effective and professional manner throughout the proceedings.”

Cement plant arbitration Swiss law

“We are always glad to win another international arbitration for another client in a highly professional and also cost-effective manner,” said William Kirtley of Aceris Law. “We have not lost a single case with our current team, including construction, commercial and a successful investor-State arbitration. Our current team took over a half-decade to build, after going through hundreds of potential candidates and trial periods with numerous lawyers. I quite strongly believe that Aceris Law provides the best value in the field of international arbitration in the world today. The only firms that offer remotely similar quality in the field of international arbitration charge three times or more our legal fees. This is a shame, since the primary complaint of users of international arbitration is its cost, which is primarily dependent on the legal fees that are being demanded from clients.”   

Filed Under: Aceris Law, ICC Arbitration, Switzerland Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

© 2012-2026 · IA