International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Agreement / William Kirtley, On Behalf Of The BNFA, Publishes Article About Barotseland’s Bid For Independence From Zambia In Jeune Afrique

William Kirtley, On Behalf Of The BNFA, Publishes Article About Barotseland’s Bid For Independence From Zambia In Jeune Afrique

09/06/2014 by International Arbitration

Acting on behalf of arbitration law firm Dugué & Kirtley’s client, the Barotseland National Freedom Alliance (BNFA), William Kirtley has published an article concerning Barotseland’s bid for independence from Zambia in the leading Francophone African news magazine Jeune Afrique.

King Mwanawina III Barotseland

King Mwanawina III of Barotseland and Rt Hon Macmillan of Great Britain (January 1960)

The former British protectorate of Barotseland willingly chose to become part of Zambia pursuant to the Barotseland Agreement 1964, a treaty brokered by the United Kingdom that was intended to preserve Barotseland’s semi-autonomous status within an independent Zambia.

Although Kenneth Kaunda, the first President of Zambia, signed the treaty himself on behalf of the Government of Northern Rhodesia, he and the Zambian Government would violate every provision of the Barotseland Agreement 1964 starting soon after Zambia’s independence, going so far as to modify the Zambian Constitution to remove all references to the Barotseland Agreement 1964, to “annulling” the British act of parliament granting sovereignty to Zambia which referred to the Barotseland Agreement 1964, to expropriating Barotseland’s treasury, to changing the name of Barotseland to the generic “Western Region” and attempting to destroy Barotseland’s previously well-functioning institutions.

Understandably, in 2012, the Barotseland National Council voted to accept Zambia’s abrogation of the Barotseland Agreement 1964, with the logical consequence that Barotseland had regained its independence since the treaty by which it freely forged a union with Zambia had ended. Yet, rather than engaging in dialogue Zambia has increased repression in the former British protectorate of Barotseland, imprisoning dozens of Barotseland activists on the charge of treason and increasing the police presence in Barotseland while refusing to consider Barotseland’s calls for the peaceful resolution of the issue of Barotseland’s legal status by way of PCA arbitration in The Hague.

imageszambia

Source: Jeune Afrique (2014)

To date, approximately 10,000 Barotseland representatives have signed a PCA arbitration agreement designed to allow an independent and neutral arbitral tribunal in The Hague to rule upon the status of the Barotseland Agreement 1964 in accordance with international law. President Sata of Zambia has steadfastly refused to sign the PCA arbitration agreement, in an apparent recognition that Zambia’s acts flagrantly violated the treaty.

The article in Jeune Afrique concerning Barotseland’s enlightened attempts to have the issue of its legal status settled by way of PCA arbitration, rather than violence as Zambia appears to be seeking, was prepared jointly by the BNFA, William Kirtley, a French social scientist, Koralie Wietrzykowski and Audrey and Christophe Dugué. It may be found online at  https://jeuneafrique.com/Article/ARTJAWEB20140606174635/ and is reproduced below.

jeuneafrique

Download the PDF file .

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Rules, Barotseland Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, PCA Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration, Zambia Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

What Are the Recoverable Costs in ICC Arbitration?

Arbitration in the Caribbean

English Arbitration Act 2025: Key Reforms

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA