The taking of evidence in international arbitration can be a critical step in many international arbitrations. Parties, or the arbitral tribunal, have often made recourse to the International Bar Association Rules on Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (“IBA Rules”), whether the parties made an express choice for them to apply or not. The IBA […]
What Makes a Good Final Award in an Arbitration?
The Final Award is the key decision in an arbitration that has important consequences, in the sense that it is the end outcome of a controversy, or a dispute submitted to an arbitral tribunal or a sole arbitrator, and it will affect the rights between the parties and may not normally be appealed. In addition […]
The National Treatment Standard – Investment Arbitration
Violations of the National Treatment standard are often alleged by claimants involved in investment arbitrations. The National Treatment standard has a simple theoretical purpose: to ensure that foreign investors or their investments will be treated no less favourably than domestic investors or their investments. The application of the National Treatment standard can vary significantly depending […]
Correction of Arbitration Awards
Correction of arbitration awards is one of the post-award remedies intended to rectify any errors, ambiguities or omissions in the arbitral tribunal’s award after its issuance. It frequently occurs in practice that arbitral awards contain certain minor, or sometimes, more significant, mistakes, ambiguities or omissions. While these errors usually concern minor and incidental issues, certain […]
Correction of Arbitral Awards in ICC Arbitration
To err is human, so the ICC Arbitration Rules provide for a special mechanism aiming to correct errors in arbitral awards. The correction of arbitral awards in ICC Arbitration is governed by Article 36 of the 2017 ICC Arbitration Rules, which reads: “Article 36: Correction and Interpretation of the Award; Remission of Awards 1) On its own […]