Summary procedures in international arbitration mean procedures by which the arbitral tribunal determines certain points of fact or law at an early stage of the proceedings, potentially dispensing with the need for further arbitration proceedings. Summary proceedings can be a blessing to a respondent facing frivolous claims that obviously lack merit, as a successful dismissal […]
The Case Against the Bifurcation of Arbitration Proceedings
Despite the common use of bifurcation in arbitration proceedings, there are many arguments against the bifurcation of most arbitral proceedings. Bifurcation refers to the separation of issues, typically dividing the proceedings into jurisdictional or procedural phases and the merits phase, or merits and quantum phases, allowing the arbitral tribunal to address and decide on specific […]
M&A Arbitration
In recent years, arbitration has become the preferred method of resolving M&A disputes. While the global market shows steady signs of recovery, arbitration is considered an effective means to resolve disputes involving M&A transactions in a wide range of sectors, such as the financial, healthcare, education, energy and technology sectors.[1] Disputes in M&A Transactions M&A […]
Changing Lawyers During an International Arbitration
There are a variety of legitimate reasons why a party might wish to change lawyers over the course of an international arbitration, which can be a long and expensive procedure. A party may lose confidence in its lawyers: the quality, loyalty and vigor of a party’s representatives can have substantial consequences for the party’s opportunity […]
Depositions in International Arbitration
Depositions in international arbitration are rare but do occur. A deposition is defined as “[a] witness’s out-of-court testimony that is reduced to writing (usually by a court reporter) for later use in court or for discovery purposes”.[1] While depositions are generally associated with American pre-trial discovery, they are called for in a surprising number of […]