International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for UNCITRAL Arbitration

Three Fabricated Contracts, One Closed Door: Bahari v Azerbaijan

08/11/2026 by International Arbitration

Fabricated Evidence Arbitration

On 21 September 2026, an arbitral tribunal (the “Tribunal”) rejected the investment claims brought by Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahari (“Mr. Bahari”), an Iranian investor, against the Republic of Azerbaijan (“Azerbaijan”). The Tribunal accepted jurisdiction over part of the dispute but held that those claims were inadmissible because Mr. Bahari had fabricated documents central to his […]

Filed Under: Azerbaijan Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

20/09/2026 by International Arbitration

Abdallah Andraous Award

On 20 May 2026, an arbitral tribunal (the “Tribunal”) constituted under the 1976 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (the “UNCITRAL Rules”) issued its Final Award (the “Award”) in Abdallah Andraous v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, ICSID Case No. UNCT/23/3. The arbitration was brought by Mr Abdallah Andraous (the “Claimant”) against the Kingdom of the Netherlands (the “Respondent”) […]

Filed Under: Investor State Dispute Settlement, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

30/08/2026 by International Arbitration

Security for Costs Investment Arbitration

Security for costs has become an increasingly important procedural issue in investment arbitration. A respondent State may spend millions defending a treaty claim and, even after prevailing and obtaining a costs award, remain exposed to non-recovery where the claimant is insolvent or has few assets against which the award can be enforced. Security for costs […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

UNCITRAL Code of Conduct for Arbitrators

01/03/2026 by International Arbitration

UNCITRAL Code of Conduct

The UNCITRAL Code of Conduct for Arbitrators in International Investment Dispute Resolution (the “UNCITRAL Code of Conduct”) recalibrates ethical expectations in investor-state dispute settlement. Adopted in 2023 under UN General Assembly Resolution 78/105 after six years of work in UNCITRAL Working Group III, it is a voluntary soft law instrument.[1] Accordingly, it sets recommended standards […]

Filed Under: Investor State Dispute Settlement, UNCITRAL Arbitration

UNCITRAL Arbitration Costs

30/11/2025 by International Arbitration

UNCITRAL Arbitration Costs

The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”) is the central body within the United Nations system responsible for modernising and harmonising international trade law.[1] Although widely used in investment and commercial disputes, it is not an arbitral institution.[2] Instead, parties use the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in ad hoc arbitration proceedings or in proceedings […]

Filed Under: UNCITRAL Arbitration

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 14
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Enforcing an Arbitral Award Against State Funds Held in Another Company’s Name

Can a Singapore Court Freeze Assets to Support an Arbitration Abroad?

Can a Distributor Demand Lower Prices Under a Price-Parity Clause?

The Urbajet Award on State Consent and Construction Losses

Three Fabricated Contracts, One Closed Door: Bahari v Azerbaijan

Defective Notice Prevents Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the United States

U.S. Court Rules That State-Owned Companies May Seek Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Against Foreign States

Annulment of the West African Aquaculture Award Against The Gambia

Can Arbitrators Cross-Examine Witnesses?

Tullow Ghana v. Ghana: Tax Arbitration and Contractual Protections

Rules of Ethics for Arbitrators: Which Apply?

LCIA Annual Casework Report 2025: Principal Statistics and Trends

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

© 2012-2026 · IA