International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for UNCITRAL Arbitration

Israeli-Palestinian ICC Arbitration Center Nears Completion

17/10/2013 by International Arbitration

The ICC’s Israeli-Palestinian Jerusalem Arbitration Center is reportedly to begin functioning soon. This neutral arbitration center, a creation of Paris’ neutral ICC International Court of Arbitration, is intended to resolve commercial conflicts concerning the 3-4 billion USD of trade between Palestinians and Israelis. Previously, such commercial conflicts had to be resolved either before the courts […]

Filed Under: Annulment of Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Rules, Court of Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, France Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, India Arbitration, Interim Measures, International Arbitration Law, International Mediation, Israel Arbitration, Jurisdiction, New York Convention, Pakistan Arbitration, Paris Arbitration, Sudan Arbitration, Syria Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the New York Convention

07/05/2013 by International Arbitration

I am pleased to inform you that the Myanmar, which has been gradually re-entering the international community, has deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. With an accession made without any reservation, Myanmar becomes the 149th State party to the Convention, which spans all major […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Rules, Armenia Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Myanmar Arbitration, New York Convention, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Recent ICSID Cases Discussed in the Investment Arbitration Reporter

27/03/2013 by International Arbitration

February 28, 2013 (Vol. 6, No. 5) 1. First hearing in Philip Morris v. Australia arbitration is pushed into 2014, as New Zealand reveals it is awaiting outcome of Australian cases 2. Effort fails in bid to disqualify former Argentine official Gabriel Bottini in Saint-Gobain v. Venezuela arbitration 3. Sri Lanka breached BIT due to […]

Filed Under: Annulment of Arbitration Award, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Argentina Arbitration, Australia Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Belize Arbitration, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Canada Arbitration, Dominica Arbitration, Dominican Republic Arbitration, Ecuador Arbitration, Egypt Arbitration, Expropriation, Guinea Arbitration, Hungary Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Indonesia Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Israel Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Mexico Arbitration, New Zealand Arbitration, Oman Arbitration, Pakistan Arbitration, Romania Arbitration, Sri Lanka Arbitration, Sudan Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration, United States Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13

Search Arbitration Information

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

Krimpets, Commerce, and Arbitration: The Supreme Court’s Latest FAA § 1 Decision

Rwanda v. UK: PCA Tribunal Rejects Claims Over the Asylum Partnership Agreement

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

Can Misconduct in Arbitration Invalidate an Award?

Indus Waters Treaty Arbitration: Can India Put the Treaty in Abeyance?

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

UNCITRAL SPEDR Adjudication and the Construction Industry

Environmental Liability in International Arbitration: Niko Resources and the Limits of Recoverable Loss

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

© 2012-2026 · IA