International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Mexico Arbitration

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

12/09/2026 by International Arbitration

Legacy Vulcan

On 27 July 2026, an arbitral tribunal (the “Tribunal”) in proceedings before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) issued its award (the “Award”) in the dispute between Legacy Vulcan, LLC (“Legacy Vulcan”) and the United Mexican States (“Mexico”). The Tribunal found that Mexico had denied fair and equitable treatment (“FET”) under Article […]

Filed Under: Investor State Dispute Settlement, Mexico Arbitration

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

16/05/2026 by International Arbitration

Pemex Arbitration

The ICC tribunal’s final award in Refinería Madero Tamaulipas, S.A.P.I. de C.V. v. Pemex Transformación Industrial is a useful decision for anyone drafting or litigating arbitration clauses in State-linked infrastructure contracts. At its core, the award answers a deceptively simple question: when a public works contract excludes disputes over early termination from arbitration, does that […]

Filed Under: Mexico Arbitration

International Arbitration in Mexico

29/10/2022 by International Arbitration

International Arbitration Mexico

It is undisputed that certain deficiencies of the Mexican judicial system have sparked the need for developing and consolidating new alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as international arbitration in Mexico. Mexico’s increasing multilateral trade, transnational dealings, disputes, as well as its international business community, have steered businesses to opt for incorporating international arbitration clauses into […]

Filed Under: Mexico Arbitration

Denial of Justice in International Arbitration

08/11/2021 by International Arbitration

Denial of justice

Denial of justice in international arbitration concerns acts or omissions of a State’s judiciary for which a State may be internationally liable. Although the judiciary is a functionally independent body from a State’s executive and government, it is still a State’s organ. As a result, States may be held internationally liable for the acts and […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Mexico Arbitration

Denial of Justice in Investment Arbitration – Claims Commission, L.FAY H. NEER AND PAULINE NEER (USA) V. UNITED MEXICAN STATES

08/05/2017 by International Arbitration

Denial of Justice in Investment Arbitration

The famous case Neer v. United Mexican States set a standard of treatment with respect to denial of justice, fair and equitable treatment and the minimum standard of treatment in international law, which is still relevant and largely applied and relied upon today in investment arbitrations. This decision was rendered on 15 October 1926 by […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Rules, International Arbitration Law, Mexico Arbitration, United States Arbitration

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

© 2012-2026 · IA