International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Agreement / Barotseland Challenges Zambia To PCA Arbitration

Barotseland Challenges Zambia To PCA Arbitration

30/03/2014 by International Arbitration

Our client, the Barotseland National Freedom Alliance, has challenged the Republic of Zambia to PCA arbitration in The Hague to settle the long-running dispute concerning the legal status of Barotseland, a former British protectorate, in a peaceful manner.

Under the terms of a bilateral treaty signed in 1964 under the auspices of the United Kingdom, named the Barotseland Agreement 1964, Barotseland was to become an autonomous region within the Republic of Zambia.

The first President of Zambia, Kenneth Kaunda, flouted this agreement and attempted to destroy all remnants of Barotseland’s sovereignty, including its sophisticated political and judicial system, while also expropriating Barotseland’s treasury and undermining the power of Barotseland’s rulers, despite the fact that Barotseland had long been recognized as a Nation which was a subject of international law.

Many human rights violations continue in Barotseland today that are attributable to the Government of Zambia. In a separate but complimentary legal procedure, the BNFA has therefore also petitioned the African Commission for Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR), based in Banjul, to bring them to an end.

In 2012, a Barotseland National Council accepted Zambia’s abrogation of the Barotseland Agreement 1964, terminating the treaty by which Barotseland initially joined Zambia. (View BBC news coverage.)  Barotseland is a nation in South Central Africa, whose territory traditionally extended to roughly ten times the size of Belgium.

In 2013, Barotseland also became a member of the UNPO, the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, joining Tibet and Taiwan at this international organization dedicated to giving a voice to peoples who are currently unrepresented at the United Nations. Many modern States, including Estonia, Latvia, Armenia and East Timor, were former members of the UNPO.

Our letter on behalf of the BNFA to President Sata, and the PCA arbitration agreement which has been submitted to the President of Zambia to sign, may be found below. If President Sata refuses to sign this arbitration agreement, this may only be viewed as an admission that Zambia is aware that its continued occupation of Barotseland is illegal under international law.

coverletter

Letter To President Sata Of Zambia

submission_agreement

PCA Submission Agreement

Dugué & Kirtley AARPI and Ms. Sylvana Sinha, who is a member of the International Arbitration Attorney Network, represent the BNFA, an umbrella group of Barotse activists formed for the purpose of coordinating the implementation of the sovereign resolutions of March 2012 Barotse National Council in a peaceful manner.

The International Arbitration Attorney Network is a group of highly-experienced arbitration practitioners based in North America, Europe and Asia, focusing on international commercial arbitration, investment treaty arbitration, and the resolution of pure public international law disputes.  One of the founding members of the International Arbitration Attorney Network is Dugué & Kirtley AARPI.

– William Kirtley (Dugué & Kirtley AARPI), Christophe Dugué (Dugué & Kirtley AARPI) and Sylvana Sinha (IAA Network)

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Procedure, Armenia Arbitration, Barotseland Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Central African Republic Arbitration, Estonia Arbitration, Latvia Arbitration, PCA Arbitration, Public International Law, Taiwan Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration, Zambia Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Arbitrations Involving International Organisations

Before Commencing Arbitration: Six Critical Questions to Ask

How to Commence an ICDR Arbitration: From Filing to Tribunal Appointment

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to ICC Arbitration

Cross-Cultural Differences and Impact on Arbitration Procedure

When Arbitrators Use AI: LaPaglia v. Valve and the Boundaries of Adjudication

Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Importance of Choosing the Right Arbitrator

Arbitration of Share Purchase Agreement Disputes Under English Law

What Are the Recoverable Costs in ICC Arbitration?

Arbitration in the Caribbean

English Arbitration Act 2025: Key Reforms

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA