International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / United States Arbitration / Aceris Achieves American Clients’ Objectives in ICDR Arbitration

Aceris Achieves American Clients’ Objectives in ICDR Arbitration

19/08/2018 by International Arbitration

Aceris Law has again achieved the outcome sought by its clients, this time in an ICDR arbitration between European claimants and Aceris’ American clients. 

The ICDR arbitration, initiated by European claimants represented by a large corporate firm, were brought against Aceris’ clients and concerned claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, fraud in the inducement, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment in relation to a significant investment.ICDR Arbitration Lawyers Succeed

In the final award, no fraud on the part of the American respondents was found, and Aceris’ jurisdictional objections on behalf of its clients also succeeded. 

William Kirtley, Nina Jankovic and Andrian Beregoi primarily served as legal advisers. 

“We are always pleased when Aceris helps our clients to obtain their objectives,” said William Kirtley, the principal of Aceris Law. “While our clients never contested that certain payments were due, which they had already offered to pay, they did very much contest the Claimants’ allegations of fraud, and it is always a pleasure when our clients’ position is fully vindicated in an arbitral award.”

Filed Under: Aceris Law, ICDR Arbitration, International Arbitration Boutiques, International Arbitration Law, United States Arbitration

Search Arbitration Information

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

Krimpets, Commerce, and Arbitration: The Supreme Court’s Latest FAA § 1 Decision

Rwanda v. UK: PCA Tribunal Rejects Claims Over the Asylum Partnership Agreement

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

Can Misconduct in Arbitration Invalidate an Award?

Indus Waters Treaty Arbitration: Can India Put the Treaty in Abeyance?

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

UNCITRAL SPEDR Adjudication and the Construction Industry

Environmental Liability in International Arbitration: Niko Resources and the Limits of Recoverable Loss

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

© 2012-2026 · IA