International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Arbitration Procedure

Economic Sanctions in International Arbitration

12/09/2018 by International Arbitration

Issues concerning economic sanctions in international arbitration frequently arise. Economic sanctions are a commonly-used tool of foreign policy which can have a significant impact on the performance of parties’ contractual rights and obligations. While there are many ways in which economic sanctions may interfere with international arbitration, we will focus on the issue of the […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Advance on Costs in ICC Arbitration

11/08/2018 by International Arbitration

Costs in ICC Arbitration

In ICC arbitration, usually upon receipt of the Answer on the Request for Arbitration or the expiry of the time limit for it[1], the Parties are required to pay an advance on costs. This payment is paramount “for the purpose of securing in advance the financial resources necessary for carrying out the arbitration procedure.”[2] The advance […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Procedure, ICC Arbitration

United Arab Emirates to Approve New Arbitration Law

24/04/2018 by International Arbitration

Emirates Arbitration Law

The UAE parliament[1] has approved a new arbitration law based on the UNCITRAL Model Law. The Cabinet of Ministers will make a final review of the new UAE arbitration law  and, afterwards, it will enter into force once the Supreme Council and Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan sign it. Experts do not expect any more in-depth […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Procedure, International Arbitration Law, United Arab Emirates Arbitration

Investor-State Dispute Settlement in Intra-EU BITs Is Incompatible with EU Law – Case C-284/16

10/03/2018 by International Arbitration

Investor-State Dispute

On 6 March 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) found that investor-State dispute settlement (“ISDS”) in intra-EU BIT’s is incompatible with EU law. The CJUE rendered the important Achmea judgment against the Opinion of the Advocate General Wathelet and found that: “Articles 267 and 344 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a provision in an international agreement […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Procedure, Investor State Dispute Settlement

State Counterclaim in Investment Arbitration

22/01/2018 by International Arbitration

An ICSID arbitral tribunal awarded approximately USD 40 million in damages to Ecuador for the foreign investor’s liability for the costs of restoring the environment in an area concerned by the investment. This award of a counterclaim in investment arbitration was made by an arbitral tribunal composed of Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Brigitte Stern and Stephen Drymer in […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Procedure, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 22
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

Krimpets, Commerce, and Arbitration: The Supreme Court’s Latest FAA § 1 Decision

Rwanda v. UK: PCA Tribunal Rejects Claims Over the Asylum Partnership Agreement

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

Can Misconduct in Arbitration Invalidate an Award?

Indus Waters Treaty Arbitration: Can India Put the Treaty in Abeyance?

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

UNCITRAL SPEDR Adjudication and the Construction Industry

Environmental Liability in International Arbitration: Niko Resources and the Limits of Recoverable Loss

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

© 2012-2026 · IA