The ICSID Convention requires signatories to treat arbitral awards rendered according to the ICSID framework as if they were a final judgment of a court in that State.[1] To challenge an award, the claimant shall seek review within the ICSID arbitral regime, rather than before State courts.[2] To implement the Convention, the U.S. Congress in […]
ICC as Appointing Authority in UNCITRAL or Other Ad Hoc Arbitration Proceedings (2018 ICC Rules)
International arbitration is governed by a cornerstone principle, the principle of consent. This means that parties are free to include, by mutual consent, an arbitration agreement in their contract. By the same token, they can organize such arbitration proceedings by choosing either an ad hoc arbitration or an arbitration administered by an institution. Nonetheless, the […]
The Concept of Arbitrability in Arbitration
Arbitrability concerns whether a type of a dispute can or cannot be settled by arbitration. In practical terms, arbitrability answers the question of whether a subject matter of a claim is or not reserved to the sphere of domestic courts, under the provisions of national laws. If the dispute is not arbitrable, the arbitral tribunal […]
The Salini Test in ICSID Arbitration
Article 25(1) of the ICSID Convention states that “[t]he jurisdiction of the Centre shall extend to any legal dispute arising directly out of an investment”. The manner in which tribunals have applied this provision has gradually evolved and has been subject to considerable debate. The Salini Test has been at the heart of this debate. […]
The SCC Arbitration Rules
Introduction As part of its 100-year anniversary in January 2017, the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (“SCC”) launched its new Arbitration Rules. The product was the result of a three-year undertaking by the Rules Revision Committee, who met regularly to discuss existing practices and to respond to user demand. The SCC’s previous Rules […]