International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

Choosing ICSID or UNCITRAL Arbitration for Investor-State Disputes

29/06/2018 by International Arbitration

ICSID or UNCITRAL for Investor-State Disputes

Should a foreign investor opt for ICSID arbitration or UNCITRAL arbitration when a choice exists? Foreign investors involved in a dispute with a host State of investment are often able to choose between initiating ICSID arbitration under the ICSID Convention or ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in order to resolve their investment dispute. This […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, UNCITRAL Arbitration

States as Claimants in Investment Arbitration

23/05/2018 by International Arbitration

Singapore International Arbitration

In classic investment arbitration disputes, an investor brings claims against a host country under an investment treaty, an investment contract, or both. Since only States are parties to bilateral investment treaties, they have obligations under these agreements. These treaties aim to give rights to foreign investors. Thus, the growth of investment disputes over the last […]

Filed Under: Bilateral Investment Treaty, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Third-Party Funding Report Presented by Task Force

02/05/2018 by International Arbitration

Third-Party Funding Report

In Sydney, an ICCA-Queen Mary task force presented a third-party funding report for international arbitration. This 272-page report is rather comprehensive and a useful resource for those interested in third-party funding and the issues it poses in the field of international arbitration. The first two chapters provide a summary of the current state of the market […]

Filed Under: International Arbitration Boutiques, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Third-Party Funding

The Notion of Going Concern in International Arbitration

05/04/2018 by International Arbitration

Going Concern in International Arbitration

In one of our previous blogs, we provided several methods used in international arbitration to estimate damages caused by treaty violations by host States. This article will focus on one of those methods, the income method (commonly known as the discounted cash flow ‘DCF’ method) and, in particular, on the notion of a ‘going concern’ for […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, International Arbitration Boutiques, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Renewable Energy Investment Arbitrations

25/03/2018 by International Arbitration

Energy Investment Arbitrations

Many renewable energy investment arbitration disputes have been initiated over recent years, including the cases Charanne and Construction Investments v. Spain, SCC Case No. V 062/2012, Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg S.à r.l. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/36, Mesa Power Group, LLC v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2012-17 and others. While […]

Filed Under: Energy Charter Treaty, Investor State Dispute Settlement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

Investment Arbitration in Mexico: Why an Over USD 2.1 Billion Claim Failed

New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Arbitration in Próspera: An Arbitration Utopia?

Timing of Jurisdictional Objections in Arbitration

Law 2540/2025: A Significant Expansion of Arbitral Power

Construction Arbitration: War, Delay Claims, and Rising Project Costs

State Immunity and ICSID Awards: The UK Supreme Court Joins International Consensus on Enforcement

Singapore’s High Court Rejects Spain’s State Immunity Defence (NextEra Energy v Spain [2026] SGHC 43)

Devas v. Antrix: Dutch Enforcement and the Limits of Seat-Based Annulment

The Iran Conflict and Arbitration Disputes

Arbitration Updates: Malaysia’s 2026 Arbitration Reform

Import of Sigma Constructores, S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala

© 2012-2026 · IA