International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

Economic Sanctions in International Arbitration

12/09/2018 by International Arbitration

Issues concerning economic sanctions in international arbitration frequently arise. Economic sanctions are a commonly-used tool of foreign policy which can have a significant impact on the performance of parties’ contractual rights and obligations. While there are many ways in which economic sanctions may interfere with international arbitration, we will focus on the issue of the […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Duty to Mitigate Damages in Investment Arbitration

17/08/2018 by International Arbitration

Investment Arbitration Damages

Notion of the Duty to Mitigate Damages Along with contributory negligence, a duty to mitigate damages is considered as a “compensation-reducing”[1] factor. However, contrary to contributory negligence, the duty to mitigate damages arises only after the breach of an international obligation. It implies an obligation for an aggrieved party to “take steps to minimize his loss, on […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Damages, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Choosing ICSID or UNCITRAL Arbitration for Investor-State Disputes

29/06/2018 by International Arbitration

ICSID or UNCITRAL for Investor-State Disputes

Should a foreign investor opt for ICSID arbitration or UNCITRAL arbitration when a choice exists? Foreign investors involved in a dispute with a host State of investment are often able to choose between initiating ICSID arbitration under the ICSID Convention or ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in order to resolve their investment dispute. This […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, UNCITRAL Arbitration

States as Claimants in Investment Arbitration

23/05/2018 by International Arbitration

Singapore International Arbitration

In classic investment arbitration disputes, an investor brings claims against a host country under an investment treaty, an investment contract, or both. Since only States are parties to bilateral investment treaties, they have obligations under these agreements. These treaties aim to give rights to foreign investors. Thus, the growth of investment disputes over the last […]

Filed Under: Bilateral Investment Treaty, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Third-Party Funding Report Presented by Task Force

02/05/2018 by International Arbitration

Third-Party Funding Report

In Sydney, an ICCA-Queen Mary task force presented a third-party funding report for international arbitration. This 272-page report is rather comprehensive and a useful resource for those interested in third-party funding and the issues it poses in the field of international arbitration. The first two chapters provide a summary of the current state of the market […]

Filed Under: International Arbitration Boutiques, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Third-Party Funding

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • …
  • 26
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

© 2012-2026 · IA