International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Third-Party Funding

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

13/06/2026 by International Arbitration

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

In DTH v DTF [2026] SGHC(I) 5, the Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) dismissed an application by successful arbitral claimants to set aside or remit the costs portion of a Singapore-seated arbitral award. The applicants had won the merits phase of the arbitration but failed before the arbitral majority to recover their third-party funding costs […]

Filed Under: Singapore Arbitration, Third-Party Funding

London Commercial Court: ICSID Awards Are Not Assignable (Operafund v Spain)

01/03/2026 by International Arbitration

Arbitration Award Assignment

In Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV Plc and Schwab Holding AG v Kingdom of Spain [2025] EWHC 2874 (Comm), the English Commercial Court held that awards rendered under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (“ICSID Convention”) or the Energy Charter Treaty 1994 (“ECT”) are not assignable to third […]

Filed Under: Investor State Dispute Settlement, Spain Arbitration, Third-Party Funding

UK Litigation Funding After PACCAR: The Court of Appeal’s Sony v. Neill Reset and the Legislative Waiting Game

01/02/2026 by International Arbitration

Litigation Funding Agreement

On 4 July 2025, the UK Court of Appeal delivered what the litigation funding sector had been waiting for: a practical ruling on the enforceability of litigation funding agreements (“LFAs”).[1] In Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd & another v. Alex Neill Class Representative Ltd (and related appeals involving Visa, Mastercard and Apple) (“Sony v. Neill”), […]

Filed Under: Third-Party Funding

Arbitration Crowdfunding

23/02/2025 by International Arbitration

Arbitration Crowdfunding

Arbitration has long been a preferred mechanism for resolving international commercial disputes. However, its cost often presents a barrier to access to justice. In response, crowdfunding has emerged as a potential solution, allowing claimants to raise funds through online platforms. This note explores the use of crowdfunding in arbitration, its ethical and practical challenges, and […]

Filed Under: Third-Party Funding

The Drawbacks of Third-Party Funding for Arbitration

14/04/2024 by International Arbitration

Drawbacks Third-Party Funding

Third-party funding has obtained a significant role in international arbitration by providing financial support to parties who may not have the means to pursue or defend a claim otherwise.[1] It can be a godsend to claimants who might otherwise be unable to enforce their rights. While the advantages of third-party funding are frequently emphasized, it […]

Filed Under: Third-Party Funding

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 5
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

Krimpets, Commerce, and Arbitration: The Supreme Court’s Latest FAA § 1 Decision

Rwanda v. UK: PCA Tribunal Rejects Claims Over the Asylum Partnership Agreement

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

Can Misconduct in Arbitration Invalidate an Award?

Indus Waters Treaty Arbitration: Can India Put the Treaty in Abeyance?

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

UNCITRAL SPEDR Adjudication and the Construction Industry

Environmental Liability in International Arbitration: Niko Resources and the Limits of Recoverable Loss

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

© 2012-2026 · IA