International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for UNCITRAL Arbitration

The PCA Secretary General’s Role as Arbitrator Appointing Authority

14/12/2016 by International Arbitration

The Secretary General of one of the oldest arbitral institutions in the word, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (the “PCA”), has a very important role under the UNCITRAL Rules as an arbitrator appointing authority. Under both the 1976 and the 2010 UNCITRAL Rules (as revised in 2013), the Secretary General acts as the appointing authority […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Rules, PCA Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Greek International Arbitration – The Legal Framework

13/12/2016 by International Arbitration

Διεθνής Εμπορική Διαιτησία στην Ελλάδα

Greek international arbitration law includes a favorable legal framework for arbitrations taking place with their seat in Greece and for the execution of arbitral awards in the country. In Greece, the international commercial arbitration regime is regulated by the 1958 New York Convention (NYC) and the UNCITRAL Model Law, where applicable. The UNCITRAL Model Law […]

Filed Under: Greece Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, UNCITRAL Arbitration

2016 UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings

02/11/2016 by International Arbitration

UNCITRAL NOTES on organizing arbitral proceedings

The first version of the UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings, aimed at assisting arbitration practitioners with the issues typically associated with arbitral proceedings, was adopted by the UNCITRAL Commission in 1996 and has been replaced by a new version in July 2016, available below. The Notes have proven to be a useful tool for […]

Filed Under: Ad Hoc Arbitration, Arbitration Rules, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Indian Investment Arbitration Regime Changes

11/10/2016 by International Arbitration

Since the beginning of 2012, India has enacted significant changes with respect to the Indian investment arbitration regime. A new model Bilateral Investment Treaty (“BIT”) was approved in 2015 and will be used to renegotiate all future BIT’s signed by India. In 2016, India also terminated its existing BIT’s with 57 countries, showing India’s intent to withdraw from the Investor-State […]

Filed Under: Bilateral Investment Treaty, Bolivia Arbitration, Ecuador Arbitration, India Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Arbitration in Saudi Arabia: 2012 Saudi Arbitration Regulations

15/08/2016 by International Arbitration

arbitration in saudi arabia

Arbitration in Saudi Arabia has changed significantly since 2012 when Saudi Arabia enacted a new arbitration law replacing thirty-year old arbitration regulations. Saudi Arbitration Law (Royal Decree No. M/34) came into force on 7 July 2012, bringing a significant number of modern solutions and reforms to Saudi Arabia’s arbitration framework. The law is based on the […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, International Arbitration Law, Saudi Arabia Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 13
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

© 2012-2026 · IA