International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Arbitration Blog

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

06/06/2026 by International Arbitration

Indonesia Resource Nationalism Arbitration

On 20 May 2026, Indonesia issued Government Regulation No. 24/2026 (PP No. 24/2026) (unofficial English translation here) on the Governance of Exports of Strategic Natural Resource Commodities (“Regulation”), which entered into force on 1 June 2026.[1] Under the Regulation, Strategic Natural Resource Commodities may only be exported by a State-owned enterprise (“SOE”) appointed by the […]

Filed Under: Indonesia Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

30/05/2026 by International Arbitration

2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

The International Chamber of Commerce (the “ICC”) has now released the newest iteration of its arbitration rules, the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules (the “2026 Rules”), which will enter into force on 1 June 2026. The 2026 Rules are evolutionary rather than revolutionary. The ICC has not fundamentally altered the structure of ICC arbitration, but it […]

Filed Under: ICC Arbitration

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

30/05/2026 by International Arbitration

Panama Arbitration

Disputes over critical assets now drive many international arbitrations. Ports, airports, energy projects, mining assets, data centres, telecom networks and transport corridors are no longer purely commercial assets. States increasingly link them to national security, economic sovereignty, supply chains and geopolitical influence. The Panama Canal ports dispute shows this trend clearly. Panama Ports Company, a […]

Filed Under: Panama Arbitration

Can Misconduct in Arbitration Invalidate an Award?

24/05/2026 by International Arbitration

Ethics of Arbitrators

International arbitration is often chosen because it offers parties a final and enforceable decision.[1] In most cases, that finality is one of its greatest advantages. However, an arbitral award is not immune from challenge.[2] Where serious misconduct has affected the proceedings, a party may be able to challenge the arbitral award before the courts of […]

Filed Under: International Arbitration Law

Indus Waters Treaty Arbitration: Can India Put the Treaty in Abeyance?

24/05/2026 by International Arbitration

Indus Waters Treaty

The Indus Waters Treaty arbitration has become one of the most significant treaty arbitration developments of 2026. It is no longer only about dams, rivers or hydropower. It is a test of whether a State can put a treaty “in abeyance”, refuse to participate in arbitration and still avoid the legal consequences of an arbitral […]

Filed Under: India Arbitration, Pakistan Arbitration, PCA Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 154
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

Krimpets, Commerce, and Arbitration: The Supreme Court’s Latest FAA § 1 Decision

Rwanda v. UK: PCA Tribunal Rejects Claims Over the Asylum Partnership Agreement

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

Can Misconduct in Arbitration Invalidate an Award?

Indus Waters Treaty Arbitration: Can India Put the Treaty in Abeyance?

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

UNCITRAL SPEDR Adjudication and the Construction Industry

Environmental Liability in International Arbitration: Niko Resources and the Limits of Recoverable Loss

When a Termination Carve-Out Does Not Bar Arbitration: Lessons from Refinería Madero v. Pemex Tri

© 2012-2026 · IA