International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for UNCITRAL Arbitration

BG GROUP PLC. V. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA – CASE NO. U.S. 12-138 (2014) – U.S. SUPREME COURT

20/05/2017 by International Arbitration

BG GROUP PLC. V. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA

In this dispute, the Claimant was part of a consortium owning majority shares in MetroGas, for the distribution of natural gas in Buenos Aires. Before the 2001 financial crisis, Argentinean law provided that gas tariffs were calculated in US dollars for profitable returns. However, the crisis led to emergency measures, one of which implemented a […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Argentina Arbitration, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Colombia Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, UNCITRAL Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration, United States Arbitration

The Presumption of Separability in International Arbitration

15/05/2017 by International Arbitration

Presumption of Separability in International Arbitration

The presumption of separability in international arbitration means that the validity of an international arbitration agreement is separate and analyzed independently from the rest of a contract. It may be the case that only the arbitration agreement itself is valid while the rest of the contract is not, or vice versa. This presumption is recognized […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, France Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Switzerland Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration, United States Arbitration

Bias in International Arbitration

05/05/2017 by International Arbitration

Bias in International Arbitration

One of the most acclaimed aspects of international arbitration is its neutrality, but charges of bias in international arbitration are frequent. Arbitrators constituting an international tribunal must be independent and free from any bias. In case of doubt, any party can challenge the independence of an arbitrator after being appointed. Bias can be real, which […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Bermuda Arbitration, Indonesia Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Irreparable Damage and Interim Measures: ENCANA CORP. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR (LCIA, Interim Award, Request for Interim Measures of Protection – 2004)

27/04/2017 by International Arbitration

Irreparable Damage and Interim Measures

In the well-known case Encana v. Ecuador, the Arbitral Tribunal refused to order interim measures on the basis of there being no irreparable damage. On January 8, 2004, Claimant requested an urgent hearing of an application for interim relief regarding the enforcement of certain measures that the Ecuadorian government had taken against one of its […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Rules, Ecuador Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, London Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Arbitration Institutions in Serbia

22/04/2017 by International Arbitration

The largest and oldest of the arbitral institutions in Serbia was the Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration, established in 1947, which is an independent entity within the Serbian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. In addition, another arbitration institution under the same Chamber which existed was the Permanent Court of Arbitration. As of 30 June 2016, […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, International Arbitration Law, Serbia Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 13
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

State Immunity and ICSID Awards: The UK Supreme Court Joins International Consensus on Enforcement

Singapore’s High Court Rejects Spain’s State Immunity Defence (NextEra Energy v Spain [2026] SGHC 43)

Devas v. Antrix: Dutch Enforcement and the Limits of Seat-Based Annulment

The Iran Conflict and Arbitration Disputes

Arbitration Updates: Malaysia’s 2026 Arbitration Reform

Import of Sigma Constructores, S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala

What Options Remain for Investor-State Arbitration Under the ECT?

London Commercial Court: ICSID Awards Are Not Assignable (Operafund v Spain)

UNCITRAL Code of Conduct for Arbitrators

Onshore UAE Pro-Arbitration Court Decisions 2024-2025

What’s In a Name? “Arbitration” and the NFL Commissioner’s Authority Under the FAA

ICJ Climate Advisory Opinion

UK Litigation Funding After PACCAR: The Court of Appeal’s Sony v. Neill Reset and the Legislative Waiting Game

International Commercial Arbitration in Chile

© 2012-2026 · IA