The presumption of separability in international arbitration means that the validity of an international arbitration agreement is separate and analyzed independently from the rest of a contract. It may be the case that only the arbitration agreement itself is valid while the rest of the contract is not, or vice versa. This presumption is recognized […]
Formal Requirements an Arbitration Award Must Satisfy to Be Enforceable in England and Wales: Anthony Lombard-Knight v Rainstorm [2014] EWCA Civ 356
This case concerns the formal requirements that an arbitration award must satisfy in order to be enforceable in England and Wales under the New York Convention of 1958 and the Arbitration Act 1996. Those instruments require that an arbitration award be duly authenticated or that its copy be duly certified. This case concerns the meaning […]
Condition Precedents to Arbitration: Emirate Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports [2014] EWHC
Condition precedents to arbitration are common, especially with respect to provisions indicating that the parties must negotiate for a certain period prior to commencing arbitral proceedings. Emirate Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports concerned a dispute arising out of a contract for the sale and purchase of iron ore entered into by the parties […]
New English Court Decision Regarding Third-Party Funding Cost Recovery in Arbitration
In 2008, Norscot Rig Management Pvt Limited (“Norscot”), the Claimant, successfully brought a claim in arbitration before the ICC in London, against Essar Oilfield Services Limited (“Essar”), the Respondent. The Arbitrator (Sir Philip Otton) held that the Respondent had breached an operation management agreement relating to an offshore drilling platform and thus was liable to pay over […]
Change of Arbitration Attorney under the LCIA Rules
As before national courts, parties’ right to choose their own arbitration attorney is a fundamental procedural right[1] that is confirmed by Article 18.1 of LCIA Rules (2014)[2] The new LCIA Rules (2014) represent the first institutional rules that limit this inherent power of the parties, in order to better conduct arbitral proceedings. Article 18.3 of the […]