Aceris Law has assisted another Canadian client in obtaining the successful resolution of an ICDR arbitration brought against it. The ICDR arbitration, initiated by a Fortune 500 American electronic commerce company against the Canadian respondent, concerned alleged illegal acts under U.S. federal law, alleged violations of Washington State law and claims of breach of contract. Following […]
The Seat of Arbitration in International Commercial Arbitration
The seat of arbitration (also known as the place or locale) is one of the most important factors to take into consideration when drafting international arbitration clauses in a contract and is often confused with the venue of the arbitration, which is not the same thing. The choice of the seat of arbitration can have […]
Aceris Successfully Resolves International Arbitration under California Law
Aceris Law has assisted a Filipino respondent in obtaining the successful resolution of a JAMS international arbitration under California law brought against it. The JAMS arbitration, initiated by a U.S. public company specialising in computer network infrastructure, was brought against the Filipino company in relation to alleged breaches of a contract. The arbitration involved parallel […]
FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC. v. KAPLAN: Arbitrating the Question of Arbitrability U.S Supreme Court (1995)
This dispute arose out of a “workout” agreement, embodied in four separate documents, which governed the “working out” of debts to First Options that MKI incurred as a result of the October 1987 stock market crash. In 1989, after entering into the agreement, MKI lost an additional USD 1.5 million. First Options then took control […]
MEDITERRANEAN ENTERPRISE V. SSANGYONG CORP.: The Interpretation of the Words “Arising Hereunder” in an Arbitration Agreement US Court of Appeals for the 9th CIRCUIT (1983)
Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Construction Co. concerns the interpretation of the words “arising hereunder” in an arbitration agreement. By way of background, the parties to the proceeding signed a “Preliminary agreement on Formation of a Joint Venture” in 1978. The agreement contained an Arbitration Clause, stating that “any disputes arising hereunder or following the […]