Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Construction Co. concerns the interpretation of the words “arising hereunder” in an arbitration agreement. By way of background, the parties to the proceeding signed a “Preliminary agreement on Formation of a Joint Venture” in 1978. The agreement contained an Arbitration Clause, stating that “any disputes arising hereunder or following the […]
International Arbitration Conventions
International arbitration is governed by both the parties’ private agreement but also by a number of international arbitration conventions that apply independently of the parties’ agreements. Those conventions and treaties’ main goal is to promote international arbitration and help to enforce arbitration awards, such as the 1923 Geneva Protocol and the 1927 Geneva Convention. These […]
Perks of International Arbitration Agreements
International arbitration has become increasingly popular because of a number of perks of international arbitration agreements that cannot be found before national or local courts. Although imperfect, this dispute resolution system aims to cure some of the shortcomings of national court systems. The first perk of international arbitration dispute resolution system is its neutrality. The […]
Commercial Arbitration in Saudi Arabia: Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the largest economy in the Arabian Gulf, has seen significant positive developments for commercial arbitration in Saudi Arabia over the past few years. We previously reported on the New Saudi Arbitration Regulations passed in 2012. However, another important development was the opening of the Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration (SCCA)[2], […]
New English Court Decision Regarding Third-Party Funding Cost Recovery in Arbitration
In 2008, Norscot Rig Management Pvt Limited (“Norscot”), the Claimant, successfully brought a claim in arbitration before the ICC in London, against Essar Oilfield Services Limited (“Essar”), the Respondent. The Arbitrator (Sir Philip Otton) held that the Respondent had breached an operation management agreement relating to an offshore drilling platform and thus was liable to pay over […]