International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for ICC Arbitration

Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Courts: Moving from Litigation to Arbitration?

18/04/2020 by International Arbitration

COVID-19 arbitration

The global difficulties caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19), various State measures imposing restrictions on the movement of people, social distancing and complete lockdowns, while necessary to protect health, are inevitably having an impact on litigation in national courts, globally. In certain countries courts have had to limit, or to even entirely close, their operations due […]

Filed Under: Ad Hoc Arbitration, COVID-19, ICC Arbitration, ICDR Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, LCIA Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Virtual Hearings in International Arbitration

13/04/2020 by International Arbitration

Virtual Hearings International Arbitration

The spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictive measures (travel restrictions, lockdowns, etc.) imposed by many governments have made it impossible for many parties, their counsel, witnesses and arbitrators from different part of the world to attend in-person hearings. Thus, tribunals and parties to ongoing proceedings typically have a choice between adjourning hearings, agreeing […]

Filed Under: COVID-19, ICC Arbitration, South Korea Arbitration, Virtual Hearings

Equal Treatment of the Parties in International Arbitration

12/03/2020 by International Arbitration

Procedural protections consist of fundamental principles, which include the right to equal treatment and the right to be heard. Procedural protections are also provided through deference to party autonomy and the arbitrator’s procedural discretion.[1] The UNCITRAL Model Law, national arbitration legislation, judicial decisions and institutional rules provide for equality of treatment in various ways. Article […]

Filed Under: ICC Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Aceris Law Wins Another ICC Arbitration under Swiss Law

30/01/2020 by International Arbitration

Cement plant arbitration Swiss law

Aceris Law is pleased to have won another ICC arbitration under Swiss law for a European client regarding the construction of a cement plant in a West African State. Representing the Employer, the dispute concerned back charges, liquidated damages for delay and damages caused by the breach of the arbitration agreement. As usual, Aceris Law’s […]

Filed Under: Aceris Law, ICC Arbitration, Switzerland Arbitration

The Recovery of In-House Costs in UNCITRAL Arbitration

30/01/2020 by International Arbitration

UNCITRAL arbitration in-house costs (1)

The 2010 UNCITRAL Rules  (the “Rules”) provide for an exhaustive list of costs that may be considered by Arbitral Tribunals when ruling on costs.[1] Article 40  of the Rules provides that the recoverable costs of arbitration include legal and other costs incurred by the parties to the extent that the arbitral tribunal determines that these […]

Filed Under: ICC Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

Investment Arbitration in Mexico: Why an Over USD 2.1 Billion Claim Failed

New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Arbitration in Próspera: An Arbitration Utopia?

Timing of Jurisdictional Objections in Arbitration

Law 2540/2025: A Significant Expansion of Arbitral Power

Construction Arbitration: War, Delay Claims, and Rising Project Costs

State Immunity and ICSID Awards: The UK Supreme Court Joins International Consensus on Enforcement

Singapore’s High Court Rejects Spain’s State Immunity Defence (NextEra Energy v Spain [2026] SGHC 43)

Devas v. Antrix: Dutch Enforcement and the Limits of Seat-Based Annulment

The Iran Conflict and Arbitration Disputes

Arbitration Updates: Malaysia’s 2026 Arbitration Reform

Import of Sigma Constructores, S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala

© 2012-2026 · IA