International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for ICC Arbitration

Equal Treatment of the Parties in International Arbitration

12/03/2020 by International Arbitration

Procedural protections consist of fundamental principles, which include the right to equal treatment and the right to be heard. Procedural protections are also provided through deference to party autonomy and the arbitrator’s procedural discretion.[1] The UNCITRAL Model Law, national arbitration legislation, judicial decisions and institutional rules provide for equality of treatment in various ways. Article […]

Filed Under: ICC Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Aceris Law Wins Another ICC Arbitration under Swiss Law

30/01/2020 by International Arbitration

Cement plant arbitration Swiss law

Aceris Law is pleased to have won another ICC arbitration under Swiss law for a European client regarding the construction of a cement plant in a West African State. Representing the Employer, the dispute concerned back charges, liquidated damages for delay and damages caused by the breach of the arbitration agreement. As usual, Aceris Law’s […]

Filed Under: Aceris Law, ICC Arbitration, Switzerland Arbitration

The Recovery of In-House Costs in UNCITRAL Arbitration

30/01/2020 by International Arbitration

UNCITRAL arbitration in-house costs (1)

The 2010 UNCITRAL Rules  (the “Rules”) provide for an exhaustive list of costs that may be considered by Arbitral Tribunals when ruling on costs.[1] Article 40  of the Rules provides that the recoverable costs of arbitration include legal and other costs incurred by the parties to the extent that the arbitral tribunal determines that these […]

Filed Under: ICC Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

How to Initiate International Arbitration

30/01/2020 by International Arbitration

Initiating-International-Arbitration

Initiating international arbitration is a rather simple process, which can be done by lawyers or even non-lawyers: In ad hoc arbitrations, normally, it requires only the service of a “Notice of Arbitration” to the respondent. In administered arbitrations, usually, it requires submission of a “Notice of Arbitration” or a “Request for Arbitration” before the competent […]

Filed Under: ICC Arbitration, ICDR Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, SIAC Arbitration, United Arab Emirates Arbitration, WIPO Arbitration

Refusing to Participate in Arbitration Proceedings

13/12/2019 by International Arbitration

Parties who signed a binding arbitration agreement are, in principle, bound by its terms. Once a dispute arises and a claimant  commences arbitration proceedings against a respondent, a general assumption is that the parties will cooperate and actively participate in the proceedings. In practice, however, it can happen that the other party, usually the respondent, […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, ICC Arbitration, ICDR Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, SCC Arbitration, SIAC Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 25
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Tullow Ghana v. Ghana: Tax Arbitration and Contractual Protections

Rules of Ethics for Arbitrators: Which Apply?

LCIA Annual Casework Report 2025: Principal Statistics and Trends

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

© 2012-2026 · IA