International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

Expropriation in Investment Arbitration

13/03/2022 by International Arbitration

Criteria for lawful expropriation

Expropriation in investment arbitration concerns two notions: (1) each State’s right to exercise sovereignty over its territory and (2) each State’s obligation to respect properties belonging to foreigners. The first means that a State may, in special circumstances, expropriate a foreign investor’s property. The second means that the expropriation of foreign-held properties will only be […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Arbitration

23/01/2022 by International Arbitration

Fair and equitable treatment

Fair and equitable treatment is a prominent standard of protection in investment arbitration disputes, which is present in most bilateral investment treaties (“BITs”).[1] The standard has evolved in post-World War II treaties. The 1948 Havana Charter for an International Trade Organization is said to be the first treaty to include “just and equitable treatment” for […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Moral Damages in Investment Arbitration

12/12/2021 by International Arbitration

Moral Damages Investment Arbitration

Under public international law, the right to claim moral damages is enshrined in Article 31(2) of the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts pursuant to which the obligation of a State to make full reparation for the injury by the internationally wrongful act includes “any damage, whether material or moral”. The commentary […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Denial of Justice in International Arbitration

08/11/2021 by International Arbitration

Denial of justice

Denial of justice in international arbitration concerns acts or omissions of a State’s judiciary for which a State may be internationally liable. Although the judiciary is a functionally independent body from a State’s executive and government, it is still a State’s organ. As a result, States may be held internationally liable for the acts and […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Mexico Arbitration

Resolving Energy Disputes Through Arbitration

04/09/2021 by International Arbitration

Energy disputes ICSID arbitration

Energy projects are usually long, complex and require a substantial level of capital. Additionally, the sector has significant exposure to geological events, political changes and environmental regulations. For these reasons, disputes are common in the energy sector, and arbitration has become the preferred method of resolving these disputes, particularly at the international level.[1] As noted […]

Filed Under: Energy Charter Treaty, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

Investment Arbitration in Mexico: Why an Over USD 2.1 Billion Claim Failed

New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Arbitration in Próspera: An Arbitration Utopia?

Timing of Jurisdictional Objections in Arbitration

Law 2540/2025: A Significant Expansion of Arbitral Power

Construction Arbitration: War, Delay Claims, and Rising Project Costs

State Immunity and ICSID Awards: The UK Supreme Court Joins International Consensus on Enforcement

Singapore’s High Court Rejects Spain’s State Immunity Defence (NextEra Energy v Spain [2026] SGHC 43)

Devas v. Antrix: Dutch Enforcement and the Limits of Seat-Based Annulment

The Iran Conflict and Arbitration Disputes

Arbitration Updates: Malaysia’s 2026 Arbitration Reform

Import of Sigma Constructores, S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala

© 2012-2026 · IA