The Philip Morris arbitration award rendered by arbitrators Professor Don McRae, Professor Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler and Dr. Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel as presiding arbitrator, has finally been made public. The controversial arbitration was brought by Philip Morris in response to Australia’s plain packaging legislation for cigarettes. On 18 December 2015, the arbitration tribunal decided that it had no […]
The Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the UAE
The United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’) ratified the New York Convention in July 2006. There are two ways to enforce foreign arbitral awards in UAE. The recommended one is using the two-level civil court system of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), since the DIFC courts are generally pro-arbitration and can be expected to enforce a […]
International Arbitration Tribunal
The international arbitration tribunal is the independent and non-governmental panel of independent and impartial experts most often composed of three members nominated by the Parties (or appointed by the international arbitration institution, or more rarely by a national court) on the basis of their legal and practical expertise and knowledge, to render a final and […]
Investor-State Arbitration – Claimant’s Counsel’s Critical Choices
Critical Choices when Bringing an Investor-State Arbitration Claimants are faced with many difficult choices when bringing an investor-State arbitration: First, Claimant will have to decide whether to bring a case at all. While this seems straightforward and obvious, it is one of the most difficult choices for a company to make as outright expropriations today […]
A Short Analysis of the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment: Can an Investor Directly Apply to International Arbitration without Resorting to Local Courts?
By Turgut Aycan Özcan & Timuçin Demir Everything concerning the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment of course started with the decision rendered in the ICSID case between a Turkish construction company, Kılıç İnşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi (“Kılıç”), and Turkmenistan. Kılıç had filed an ICSID case (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/01) against Turkmenistan […]