International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for International Arbitration Law

HULLEY ENTERPRISES LIMITED (CYPRUS) V. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (PCA CASE NO. AA226) – FINAL AWARD 18 July 2014

26/05/2017 by International Arbitration

HULLEY ENTERPRISES LIMITED (CYPRUS) V. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

The Yukos group of companies, whose controlling shareholders were OAO Yukos Oil Company, Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus), Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) and Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus), was supposed to benefit from tax exemptions. However, in 2002, these exemptions were revoked at the Closed Administrative Territorial Units (“ZATOs”). Then, starting in 2003, Yukos suffered […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Cyprus Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, PCA Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

VANNESSA VENTURES LTD. V. THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA (ICSID CASE NO ARB (AF)/04/6) – AWARD 16 January 2013

24/05/2017 by International Arbitration

VANNESSA VENTURES LTD. V. THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA

On 16 January 2013, an Arbitral Tribunal rendered an award dismissing all claims on the merits of the Canadian company Vanessa Ventures Ltd in relation to its investment in a mining project in Venezuela, under a bilateral investment treaty between Canada and Venezuela. At the beginning of the 1990’s, Placer Dome Inc (“PDI”) had contracted […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Canada Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Venezuela Arbitration

BG GROUP PLC. V. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA – CASE NO. U.S. 12-138 (2014) – U.S. SUPREME COURT

20/05/2017 by International Arbitration

BG GROUP PLC. V. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA

In this dispute, the Claimant was part of a consortium owning majority shares in MetroGas, for the distribution of natural gas in Buenos Aires. Before the 2001 financial crisis, Argentinean law provided that gas tariffs were calculated in US dollars for profitable returns. However, the crisis led to emergency measures, one of which implemented a […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Argentina Arbitration, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Colombia Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, UNCITRAL Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration, United States Arbitration

The Presumption of Separability in International Arbitration

15/05/2017 by International Arbitration

Presumption of Separability in International Arbitration

The presumption of separability in international arbitration means that the validity of an international arbitration agreement is separate and analyzed independently from the rest of a contract. It may be the case that only the arbitration agreement itself is valid while the rest of the contract is not, or vice versa. This presumption is recognized […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, France Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Switzerland Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration, United States Arbitration

Denial of Justice in Investment Arbitration – Claims Commission, L.FAY H. NEER AND PAULINE NEER (USA) V. UNITED MEXICAN STATES

08/05/2017 by International Arbitration

Denial of Justice in Investment Arbitration

The famous case Neer v. United Mexican States set a standard of treatment with respect to denial of justice, fair and equitable treatment and the minimum standard of treatment in international law, which is still relevant and largely applied and relied upon today in investment arbitrations. This decision was rendered on 15 October 1926 by […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Rules, International Arbitration Law, Mexico Arbitration, United States Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • …
  • 28
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

A FRANDly Forum? The Growing Role of Arbitration in SEP Disputes

LSG Building Solutions v. Romania: Annulment Is Not an Appeal

When an Arbitral Award Becomes State Aid

Moral Damages in Investor-State Arbitration after Emergofin

Transnational Issue Estoppel in International Arbitration: Can It Prevent Re-Litigation at the Enforcement Stage?

What the ICC’s 2025 Statistics Tell Us About the Direction of International Arbitration

Deepfakes in International Arbitration

French Court of Cassation Limits Enforcement Against State-Linked Assets Where EU Stability Objectives Are at Stake

Ukraine v. Russia UNCLOS Award on Environment and Navigation

Russian Court Refuses Recognition and Enforcement of LCIA Awards Against RUSAL on Public Order Grounds

Blasket v. Spain: Limits on Sovereign Asset Discovery

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

© 2012-2026 · IA