International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

A Short Analysis of the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment: Can an Investor Directly Apply to International Arbitration without Resorting to Local Courts?

19/08/2015 by International Arbitration

By Turgut Aycan Özcan & Timuçin Demir Everything concerning the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment of course started with the decision rendered in the ICSID case between a Turkish construction company, Kılıç İnşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi (“Kılıç”), and Turkmenistan. Kılıç had filed an ICSID case (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/01) against Turkmenistan […]

Filed Under: Annulment of Arbitration Award, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Construction Arbitration, Court of Arbitration, France Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Paris Arbitration, Turkey Arbitration, Turkmenistan Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Consent and Nationality In ICSID Jurisprudence: Two Old Chestnuts of ICSID Jurisdiction Revisited

12/08/2015 by International Arbitration

Consent and nationality are two concepts of deep significance in ICSID jurisprudence. Consent forms a fundamental pillar of ICSID jurisdiction, and counsel for would-be ICSID claimants regularly advise their clients to express their consent to arbitrate as early as possible. Nationality is an equally core component of ICSID jurisdiction, with the place of incorporation test […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Public International Law, Ukraine Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

Damages in International Arbitration – Yukos Arbitration

27/07/2015 by International Arbitration

THE VALUATION DATE FOR DAMAGES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION – YUKOS ARBITRATION The valuation date for damages in international arbitration is clearly important, and it does not always coincide with date suggested by the Parties in an international arbitration. The Yukos arbitration illustrates this point. The two most significant valuation dates for damages, from a quantum […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Expropriation, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility, United Kingdom Arbitration

Russia’s Strategy on Quantum – Yukos Arbitration

16/07/2015 by International Arbitration

Yukos damages

RUSSIA’S STRATEGY NOT TO RESPOND SUBSTANTIVELY TO QUANTUM IN THE YUKOS ARBITRATION In order to help the Tribunal reach a proper valuation of Yukos Oil Company, Claimants put forward 13 possible scenarios.  The claims ranged from USD 30 billions to USD 114 billions (Final Award, para. 1701 – 1710) and the three main sets of […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, PCA Arbitration, Public International Law, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility, United Kingdom Arbitration

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced

06/07/2015 by International Arbitration

Ukrainian flag

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced An investor-State emergency arbitrator award was enforced by a domestic court in Ukraine, as was initially reported by the Global Arbitration Review. This decision is interesting since it is the first known enforcement of an emergency arbitrator award against a State. Emergency arbitrator awards are non-binding on an arbitral tribunal, but remain in […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Emergency Arbitrator, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Ukraine Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Effective Case Management in International Arbitration

Analysing the Site Visit Model Protocol for International Arbitration

Interpreting Treaties in Investment Arbitration

Blowing the Whistle on CAS: The CJEU’s RFC Seraing v. FIFA Decision

How Enforcement Works: Turning Arbitral Awards into Real-World Results

Notice of Arbitration by SMS: Efficiency vs. Fairness

Avoiding Pathological Arbitration Clauses: Do’s and Don’ts for In-House Counsel

OAC Arbitration Rules

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Personal Jurisdiction in Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Arbitration Enforcement Cases

International Arbitration in Mauritius

Confidentiality in International Arbitration

WTO Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration (MPIA): Shrinking the Void?

Translate


Recommended Links

  • International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)
  • International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
  • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
  • SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC)
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  • Vienna International Arbitration Centre (VIAC)

About Us

The international arbitration information on this website is sponsored by the international arbitration law firm Aceris Law LLC.

© 2012-2025 · IA