International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

Yukos Awards Annulment by The Hague District Court

01/05/2016 by International Arbitration

The Yukos Awards annulment surprised many. In the Final Award rendered on 18 July 2014, after 10 years of proceedings, the Arbitral Tribunal unanimously ruled that the Russian Federation had taken measures having an effect equivalent to nationalization or expropriation under the ECT and granted Claimants (Yukos Universal Limited, Hulley Enterprises Limited and Veteran Petroleum Limited) […]

Filed Under: Annulment of Arbitration Award, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Expropriation, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility

Third Party Funding Is Being Regulated

03/03/2016 by International Arbitration

For the first time an International Investment Agreement (IIA) is about to include an express reference to third party funding. The draft Free-Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union (EU) and Vietnam is paving the way for regulating third party funding in treaties. This regulation effort occurs in a context of booming of third party funding […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Procedure, Bolivia Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, PCA Arbitration, Security for Costs in Arbitration, Third-Party Funding, United States Arbitration

Investment Disputes: The Role of Third Party Funders

16/02/2016 by International Arbitration

international arbitration locations

The Role of Third Party Funders in Investment Disputes In investment disputes, when the claimant decides to pull the trigger and bring forward, one can wonder what his options are to finance the arbitral proceedings. Claimants most often do not have much capital left and are in a distressed financial situation but their claims have […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Cost, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Canada Arbitration, China Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Expropriation, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, London Arbitration, New York Convention, Switzerland Arbitration, Third-Party Funding, United Kingdom Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

Investor-State Arbitration – Claimant’s Counsel’s Critical Choices

07/01/2016 by International Arbitration

investor-state arbitration

Critical Choices when Bringing an Investor-State Arbitration Claimants are faced with many difficult choices when bringing an investor-State arbitration: First, Claimant will have to decide whether to bring a case at all. While this seems straightforward and obvious, it is one of the most difficult choices for a company to make as outright expropriations today […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Rules, Arbitrator, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Czech Republic Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Expropriation, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Italy Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Switzerland Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

What future for investor-State arbitration: The European perspective.

20/11/2015 by International Arbitration

Although the topic is not new, it seems that there are always new things to say about investor-State arbitration when looking at the amount of articles and documents issued and published almost on a daily basis by the EU Commission and Parliament, national governments and parliaments but also academics, practitioners, the media, blogs, etc. This […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

Investment Arbitration in Mexico: Why an Over USD 2.1 Billion Claim Failed

New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Arbitration in Próspera: An Arbitration Utopia?

Timing of Jurisdictional Objections in Arbitration

Law 2540/2025: A Significant Expansion of Arbitral Power

Construction Arbitration: War, Delay Claims, and Rising Project Costs

State Immunity and ICSID Awards: The UK Supreme Court Joins International Consensus on Enforcement

Singapore’s High Court Rejects Spain’s State Immunity Defence (NextEra Energy v Spain [2026] SGHC 43)

Devas v. Antrix: Dutch Enforcement and the Limits of Seat-Based Annulment

The Iran Conflict and Arbitration Disputes

Arbitration Updates: Malaysia’s 2026 Arbitration Reform

Import of Sigma Constructores, S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala

© 2012-2026 · IA