International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

A Short Analysis of the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment: Can an Investor Directly Apply to International Arbitration without Resorting to Local Courts?

19/08/2015 by International Arbitration

By Turgut Aycan Özcan & Timuçin Demir Everything concerning the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment of course started with the decision rendered in the ICSID case between a Turkish construction company, Kılıç İnşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi (“Kılıç”), and Turkmenistan. Kılıç had filed an ICSID case (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/01) against Turkmenistan […]

Filed Under: Annulment of Arbitration Award, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Construction Arbitration, Court of Arbitration, France Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Paris Arbitration, Turkey Arbitration, Turkmenistan Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Consent and Nationality In ICSID Jurisprudence: Two Old Chestnuts of ICSID Jurisdiction Revisited

12/08/2015 by International Arbitration

Consent and nationality are two concepts of deep significance in ICSID jurisprudence. Consent forms a fundamental pillar of ICSID jurisdiction, and counsel for would-be ICSID claimants regularly advise their clients to express their consent to arbitrate as early as possible. Nationality is an equally core component of ICSID jurisdiction, with the place of incorporation test […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Public International Law, Ukraine Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

Damages in International Arbitration – Yukos Arbitration

27/07/2015 by International Arbitration

THE VALUATION DATE FOR DAMAGES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION – YUKOS ARBITRATION The valuation date for damages in international arbitration is clearly important, and it does not always coincide with date suggested by the Parties in an international arbitration. The Yukos arbitration illustrates this point. The two most significant valuation dates for damages, from a quantum […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Expropriation, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility, United Kingdom Arbitration

Russia’s Strategy on Quantum – Yukos Arbitration

16/07/2015 by International Arbitration

Yukos damages

RUSSIA’S STRATEGY NOT TO RESPOND SUBSTANTIVELY TO QUANTUM IN THE YUKOS ARBITRATION In order to help the Tribunal reach a proper valuation of Yukos Oil Company, Claimants put forward 13 possible scenarios.  The claims ranged from USD 30 billions to USD 114 billions (Final Award, para. 1701 – 1710) and the three main sets of […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, PCA Arbitration, Public International Law, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility, United Kingdom Arbitration

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced

06/07/2015 by International Arbitration

Ukrainian flag

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced An investor-State emergency arbitrator award was enforced by a domestic court in Ukraine, as was initially reported by the Global Arbitration Review. This decision is interesting since it is the first known enforcement of an emergency arbitrator award against a State. Emergency arbitrator awards are non-binding on an arbitral tribunal, but remain in […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Emergency Arbitrator, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Ukraine Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

A FRANDly Forum? The Growing Role of Arbitration in SEP Disputes

LSG Building Solutions v. Romania: Annulment Is Not an Appeal

When an Arbitral Award Becomes State Aid

Moral Damages in Investor-State Arbitration after Emergofin

Transnational Issue Estoppel in International Arbitration: Can It Prevent Re-Litigation at the Enforcement Stage?

What the ICC’s 2025 Statistics Tell Us About the Direction of International Arbitration

Deepfakes in International Arbitration

French Court of Cassation Limits Enforcement Against State-Linked Assets Where EU Stability Objectives Are at Stake

Ukraine v. Russia UNCLOS Award on Environment and Navigation

Russian Court Refuses Recognition and Enforcement of LCIA Awards Against RUSAL on Public Order Grounds

Blasket v. Spain: Limits on Sovereign Asset Discovery

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

© 2012-2026 · IA